It is typo..kmaherali wrote:I think what he mwans is the God
I think what he means is God....
shivaathervedi wrote:1. Pir Shihabuddin in Risala wrote, The commander of the faithfuls, Ali says:" I WOULD NEVER WORSHIP GOD IF I HAD NOT SEEN HIM." Question arises 'worship of which God Mowla Ali is talking about?
2. In KIM (Gujrati addition, page # 61) Mowlana Sultan Muhammad Shah said in a Farman, " MOWLA ALI YE FARMAVIOU(N) KE,HU(N) KHUDA NEY JOU(N) NAHI TOU IBADAT PUNN KARU(N) NAHI", Mowla Ali said, I shall not worship God, until I see Him not.
There is resemblance in above both Farmans, one by Imam and other by Pir.
kmaherali wrote:I think what he mwans is the God that one realizes through spiritual enlightenment or the third eye. When one develops spiritually one aquires the third eye through which God is seen or experienced.shivaathervedi wrote:1. Pir Shihabuddin in Risala wrote, The commander of the faithfuls, Ali says:" I WOULD NEVER WORSHIP GOD IF I HAD NOT SEEN HIM." Question arises 'worship of which God Mowla Ali is talking about?
2. In KIM (Gujrati addition, page # 61) Mowlana Sultan Muhammad Shah said in a Farman, " MOWLA ALI YE FARMAVIOU(N) KE,HU(N) KHUDA NEY JOU(N) NAHI TOU IBADAT PUNN KARU(N) NAHI", Mowla Ali said, I shall not worship God, until I see Him not.
There is resemblance in above both Farmans, one by Imam and other by Pir.
Pir Sadardeen in the Ginan: Sakhi Mahapad Vaat says:
sakhee kahevaa sareekho nathee ke maaro saamee jee re
eto jovaa sareekho chhe alakh anaamee re.........................12
O beloved ones, my Lord (attained through this experience) does
not bear any telling (as He is undescribable) and He is nameless.
He can only be seen or experienced.
http://ismaili.net/heritage/node/23118
Sorry this can not be done. These threads have been polluted so much that it is better that the discussion on those subjects stops there. When people repeat the same again and again in a thread, it is just a waste of time.shivaathervedi wrote:To Admin,
Please unlock all the threads you locked except the duplicate ones.
Le the information, knowledge, ideas, research flow and glow. May be in future some one want to add some valuable information. Blocking the threads or accounts is not healthy. Let the descent arguments and debate flourish.
Thanks.
So this thread was QULAdmin wrote:The proper order is -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ....
Shunya ma thi shabad
which means Imam-Khat-Nirinjan-Essence first (-1), then Shunya-Nothingness (0), then the Shabad-Word (1), everything else which follows is creation
In the beginning, there was the Word, and the Word was with God and the Word was God. My personal opinion is that the God referred to is what people call God according to their own intellect, the God that has attributes but in reality God is above attributes. How many level above? This is a matter of personal understanding and beliefs.
If Qul is related to the origin of the command, the Shabd:zznoor wrote:So this thread was QULAdmin wrote:The proper order is -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ....
.
Why did you answer 0 to ----?, a non QUL post
So you also participated in polluting of thread
Is -1=0 and 0=1?Admin wrote:If Qul is related to the origin of the command, the Shabd:zznoor wrote:So this thread was QULAdmin wrote:The proper order is -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ....
.
Why did you answer 0 to ----?, a non QUL post
So you also participated in polluting of thread
Qul is any of the 3 choices -1, 0, 1 according to each person's belief.
This apply of course to people who have some definite beliefs, not to people who are still in search.
Probably Mazhar will say Qul is 1, Nuseiri will say Qul is 0
What about you? In your belief, is Qul above attributes or below, or do you equate Qul to the Attributes? Confused? No problem. In its essence, mysticism is complex.
Actually you may be joking or you may be sarcastic but you are not far from the reality. The Word does appear our of nowhere, and there is the concept of creation ex-nihilo. You may want to compare this with your magical trick. After all, God is the greatest magicianshivaathervedi wrote: Is it a magical trick! like rabbit came out of hat or chicken came out of handkerchief.
Admin wrote:Actually you may be joking or you may be sarcastic but you are not far from the reality. The Word does appear our of nowhere, and there is the concept of creation ex-nihilo. You may want to compare this with your magical trick. After all, God is the greatest magicianshivaathervedi wrote: Is it a magical trick! like rabbit came out of hat or chicken came out of handkerchief.
Still I am waiting for my above question.shivaathervedi wrote:Is Risala e Dar Haqiqat e Din written by Pir Shihabuddin (Kalaam e Pir) be considered same as Ginans written by Pir Sadardin and Pir Hasan Kabiruddin?
In the beginning of the Risala, Pir Shahbudin states:shivaathervedi wrote:Still I am waiting for my above question.shivaathervedi wrote:Is Risala e Dar Haqiqat e Din written by Pir Shihabuddin (Kalaam e Pir) be considered same as Ginans written by Pir Sadardin and Pir Hasan Kabiruddin?
Admin shed some light on my question. Where are star contributors of this forum. Wake up, please.
Good, in your opinion Risala e Haqiqat e Din is considered Ginan/Farman and is Guidance as mentioned in above paragraph of Pir Shihabuddin.kmaherali wrote:In the beginning of the Risala, Pir Shahbudin states:shivaathervedi wrote:Still I am waiting for my above question.shivaathervedi wrote:Is Risala e Dar Haqiqat e Din written by Pir Shihabuddin (Kalaam e Pir) be considered same as Ginans written by Pir Sadardin and Pir Hasan Kabiruddin?
Admin shed some light on my question. Where are star contributors of this forum. Wake up, please.
In the name of God, the merciful, the Compassionate!
Says the humble slave of Hadrati Shahinshahi Agha Ali Shah, ---may my spirit be sacrificed for him!-Shihabu'd-din al-Husayni: some brethren in religion, whose desire I regard myself obliged to fulfill, have asked me to write, in the form of a concise book, the principles which should guide them in their lives, showing them the right way of moving amongst their brethren in this world, that they may know, and, -if God pleases,-comply with all counsels, thus obtaining peace of mind. [2] With the help of God I was enabled to comply with their request.
From the above statement it is quite clear that the Risala is meant for guidance to his followers and hence it can be considered as Ginan/Farman
Every particle in universe is Mazhar of Allah. Broken record JAANDAR HAI, BUJJ RAHA HAI PER BEY AWAAZ HAI. Your uncle has written, I quote ( read under your post ), " Not try to search words of DEAD B OR C category PIRS WITHOUT KNOWLEDGE." Give some blessings to your uncle N. Do you consider Pir Shihabuddin as your Pir ?ismaili103 wrote:Seems like Mazhar starts every thread with different name only to prove that
" Ali is not Allah ". But everytime he fails miserably and then starts a new thread with same old broken record.
Can elaborate in what way did he change the course. Did he compromise on the concept of Ali Allah? Did he compromise on the notion of a living Imam who is the Mazhar? If not how can you say he changed the course?shivaathervedi wrote: In my opinion Pir Shihabuddin changed the course, in Risala he adopted completely Shi'i traditions. He quoted Quran frequently in favor of his statements. He has not quoted even a part of any Ginan, though he was aware of Sutpanthi traditions. No where in Risala Pir has mentioned names of Brahma, Vishnu, Krishan or Rama. There is no trace of Hindu mythology in Risala. He has explained the Ja'fari Madhab and followed Fatimi Tariqa. Hazar Imam has also mentioned that Ismailis follow Ja'fri Madhab.
kmaherali wrote:Can elaborate in what way did he change the course. Did he compromise on the concept of Ali Allah? Did he compromise on the notion of a living Imam who is the Mazhar? If not how can you say he changed the course?shivaathervedi wrote: In my opinion Pir Shihabuddin changed the course, in Risala he adopted completely Shi'i traditions. He quoted Quran frequently in favor of his statements. He has not quoted even a part of any Ginan, though he was aware of Sutpanthi traditions. No where in Risala Pir has mentioned names of Brahma, Vishnu, Krishan or Rama. There is no trace of Hindu mythology in Risala. He has explained the Ja'fari Madhab and followed Fatimi Tariqa. Hazar Imam has also mentioned that Ismailis follow Ja'fri Madhab.
He says in the Risala:
It is obvious, therefore, that there must be in the world a Supreme Leader (rah-nand) at every time, every moment. Humanity are like children, -they may be clever in their own way, and yet there are many things that are beyond their power of comprehension. Therefore they need a teacher, who may give them necessary knowledge
Which other Shia denomination believes in that?
He was the Pir for only 4 years and therefore it would be difficult to judge someone's ideas based on 4 years and only one book. MSMS who became the Pir after hime clearly sanctioned the Ginans and ideas and personalities of the Hindu tradition. Didn't he say in 1945 that Hindu mythology must be retained?
All this will be clear in your mind by the end of the forthcoming Jubilee when we release hundreds of manuscripts and correspondence from that period. You will be able to read the Asal Dua recited by Pir Shabuddin Shah in presence of Mowlana Aga Ali Shah. Then you can decide what are the names in that Dua and if it fit your knowledge of Ismailism as defined by Pir Shihabuddin Shah.shivaathervedi wrote:
Still I am waiting for my above question....
Admin shed some light on my question. Where are star contributors of this forum. Wake up, please ....... No where in Risala Pir has mentioned names of Brahma, Vishnu, Krishan or Rama. There is no trace of Hindu mythology in Risala.
You are absolutely right. When a Pir is appointed he is fully qualified for the position. Pir Shahbudin's son was appointed Pir as a baby. But when one makes a statement that he changed course based on one work only without understanding of all his activities including him reciting the Old Dua infront of the Imam, then it is totally inappropriate.shivaathervedi wrote: I wander you wrote,"He ( Pir Shihabuddin ) was Pir for 4 years and therefore it would be difficult to judge some one's ideas based on 4 years and only one book." Strange, it sounds like because he was Pir for 4 years and wrote just a one treatise that's why he was an un experienced Pir!! Are you categorizing Pirs, one superior than other, or lacking in experience and not of caliber like Pir Sadardin or Pir Hasan Kabiruddin? Age difference does not reduce the status of Pir. In status, a 3 month Pir is same as 120 years Pir, Am I right?.
What has the change to Aliyullah got to do with Hindu Mythology. Did the Imam indicate that with the change to Aliyullah we will not have Hindu mythology?shivaathervedi wrote: That what MSMS did, in 1945 he sternly declined but in 1950 he changed Aliyullah himself. So it was according to your explanation ' times changes so the the form of faith changes'. ( these are your words ).
MHI in his public speeches says Bis millahir Rahmanir Rahim and reads speeches. When he makes Farmans he begins with My Dear Spiritual Children and he does not read.shivaathervedi wrote: My answer to your your following question is;
" Did he compromise on the concept of Ali Allah?"
Please read the Paragraphs which I posted on page 3 from Risala,
Imam Hussain's Giryah, He implored to Allah, " I wanted to see thy VISION of thy PERFECTION........"
Pir Shihabuddin wrote, the commander of the faithfuls, ALI said," I would NEVER worship GOD if I had not seen Him."
He starts the first topic by writing," Lord of lords, Mowla Ali 'UPON WHOM BE THE BLESSINGS OF GOD ( which God? ).
For Imam Aga Ali shah, he has used the words " Hazrat i Shahinshah i Aga Ali Shah OR Hazrat i Mowla.
Precisely post like this is used as proof by non Ismailis as proof that their Imam speaks from both end of mouth. One for general public and another to ismailis in private and perhaps third to higher level Ismailis.MHI in his public speeches says Bis millahir Rahmanir Rahim and reads speeches. When he makes Farmans he begins with My Dear Spiritual Children and he does not read.
I am dying to see the old manuscripts, correspondence, classified Farmans of MSMS and Shah Karim and Asal Du'a. So far I am unable to find copy of Asal Du'a. According to you, in what year Pir Shihabuddin recited Asal Du'a in presence of Imam Ali Shah?Admin wrote:All this will be clear in your mind by the end of the forthcoming Jubilee when we release hundreds of manuscripts and correspondence from that period. You will be able to read the Asal Dua recited by Pir Shabuddin Shah in presence of Mowlana Aga Ali Shah. Then you can decide what are the names in that Dua and if it fit your knowledge of Ismailism as defined by Pir Shihabuddin Shah.shivaathervedi wrote:
Still I am waiting for my above question....
Admin shed some light on my question. Where are star contributors of this forum. Wake up, please ....... No where in Risala Pir has mentioned names of Brahma, Vishnu, Krishan or Rama. There is no trace of Hindu mythology in Risala.