We are pleased to advise that updated copies of the Ismaili Constitution will be available for purchase at Literature Centres starting Friday May 22, for $5.
Ismaili Constitution 2025 - First signed by Shah Rahim Aga Khan V
Ismaili Constitution 2025 - First signed by Shah Rahim Aga Khan V
Ismaili Constitution Announcement heard in Jamatkhanas
We are pleased to advise that updated copies of the Ismaili Constitution will be available for purchase at Literature Centres starting Friday May 22, for $5.
Excerpts of the Constitution will also be periodically read in Jamatkhana for the Jamat’s awareness.
We are pleased to advise that updated copies of the Ismaili Constitution will be available for purchase at Literature Centres starting Friday May 22, for $5.
-
mahebubchatur
- Posts: 831
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 7:01 pm
Re: Ismaili Constitution 2025 - First signed by Shah Rahim Aga Khan V
#Ismaili #Constitution, amended on February 11, 2025, has now been officially printed by Leaders The Institute of Ismaili Studies
His Highness the Aga Khan sent a reminder to the leadership on March 18, 2025, instructing that it be made available to every community member,
- without exception.
Hazar Imam affirmed that The amended constitution was to be implemented immediately on 11 February 2025
It is confirmed that the Constitution has now been printed and announced in the Jamat, currently in Montréal, Canada, where it is being sold for $5. This is accessible to every member of the community who can afford it and wishes to buy it, in accordance with the Constitution and the Farmans - Directions of His Highness the Aga Khan, to be given freely to every member globally without exception.
As ordained in the original Farmans and Constitutions of 1986 and 1998, and on 18 March 2025 , - the Ismaili Constitution is to be given freely to every Ismaili without exception and further to be read together with all Farmans and further It is also a Farman itself, as defined by Hazar Imam, the Aga Khan in the constitution too
Announcement
*Ismaili Constitution*
We are pleased to advise that updated copies of the Ismaili Constitution will be available for purchase at all Jamatkhana Literature Centres except for Generations starting *Friday, May 22*, for $5.
Copies will also be available for reference through the Jamati Mukhi Kamadia and Mukhiani Kamadiani.
Excerpts of the Constitution will also be periodically read in Jamatkhana for the Jamat’s awareness.
A request has been sent to leadership for comment or clarification- not received so far
18 March 2025
Farman - Talika Globally
“I AM MOST HAPPY TO INFORM MY JAMAT THAT I HAVE DIRECTED THAT THE UPDATED CONSTITUTION WHICH ENCOMPASSES THE INSTRUMENT I SIGNED ON THE OCCASION OF MY TAKHT-NISHINI BE MADE AVAILABLE TO MY JAMAT" HAZAR IMAM
AGA KHAN V 18 MARCH 2025
More at https://www.linkedin.com/posts/activity ... =copy_link
His Highness the Aga Khan sent a reminder to the leadership on March 18, 2025, instructing that it be made available to every community member,
Hazar Imam affirmed that The amended constitution was to be implemented immediately on 11 February 2025
It is confirmed that the Constitution has now been printed and announced in the Jamat, currently in Montréal, Canada, where it is being sold for $5. This is accessible to every member of the community who can afford it and wishes to buy it, in accordance with the Constitution and the Farmans - Directions of His Highness the Aga Khan, to be given freely to every member globally without exception.
As ordained in the original Farmans and Constitutions of 1986 and 1998, and on 18 March 2025 , - the Ismaili Constitution is to be given freely to every Ismaili without exception and further to be read together with all Farmans and further It is also a Farman itself, as defined by Hazar Imam, the Aga Khan in the constitution too
Announcement
We are pleased to advise that updated copies of the Ismaili Constitution will be available for purchase at all Jamatkhana Literature Centres except for Generations starting *Friday, May 22*, for $5.
Copies will also be available for reference through the Jamati Mukhi Kamadia and Mukhiani Kamadiani.
A request has been sent to leadership for comment or clarification- not received so far
18 March 2025
Farman - Talika Globally
“I AM MOST HAPPY TO INFORM MY JAMAT THAT I HAVE DIRECTED THAT THE UPDATED CONSTITUTION WHICH ENCOMPASSES THE INSTRUMENT I SIGNED ON THE OCCASION OF MY TAKHT-NISHINI BE MADE AVAILABLE TO MY JAMAT" HAZAR IMAM
AGA KHAN V 18 MARCH 2025
More at https://www.linkedin.com/posts/activity ... =copy_link
-
mahebubchatur
- Posts: 831
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 7:01 pm
Ismaili Constitution 2025 A Farman - First signed by Shah Rahim Aga Khan V
Qur’an, - Farmans - Ismaili Constitution
Religious Texts, Authorship, and Copyright in the Modern World
A recurring question in copyright law is whether sacred or religious texts can be subject to ownership, especially where they are believed to originate from a divine source rather than a human author.
If a message is understood as being transmitted rather than personally authored — where the communicator is not the originator of the words but only the transmitter — then it raises a fundamental question for copyright law: can “authorship” exist in the legal sense at all?
This question becomes even more significant when considering texts that adherents believe to be divinely revealed rather than human-created.
Recent developments in artificial intelligence have brought renewed attention to these questions, as courts and policymakers are currently grappling with lawsuits and legal disputes concerning whether AI systems can lawfully use copyrighted material for training, and whether outputs derived from large-scale information processing may infringe copyright protections.
Copyright law, however, does not engage with questions of faith or metaphysical origin. It operates on a strictly legal definition of authorship: a work must result from human creative expression fixed in a tangible form.
This creates a conceptual tension when applied to religious scripture. In many faith traditions, sacred texts are understood not as human literary works, but as revelations transmitted through a messenger who is not regarded as the author of the message itself.
From a legal standpoint, however, copyright does not recognise divine origin as a category of authorship. The law neither affirms nor denies theological claims; it simply operates outside of them.
Religious texts and copyright status
In practice, original scriptural texts such as ancient religious manuscripts are generally treated as public domain works, particularly in their original languages.
This means the underlying text itself is not owned by any individual or organisation in a copyright sense.
However, copyright protection can and does apply to human contributions surrounding those texts, including:
* translations into other languages
* editorial commentary and interpretation
* annotated or scholarly editions
* formatting, typography, and layout of printed versions
* audio recordings and recitations
* digital applications and curated compilations
In each case, the law protects the human intellectual effort in expression, arrangement, and presentation, not the underlying sacred message itself.
Key legal principle
At the heart of copyright law is a simple but important distinction:
Copyright protects the expression created by humans — not the ideas, beliefs, facts, or meanings being expressed.
This principle allows sacred texts, scientific facts, historical accounts, and philosophical ideas to remain freely accessible, while still protecting the creative labour of translators, editors, publishers, and commentators.
Why this matters today
As artificial intelligence systems increasingly interact with vast bodies of human knowledge, this distinction becomes more important.
The central legal and ethical question is not whether information is true, sacred, or historical — but whether a system is reproducing protected human expression, or generating new output based on underlying ideas.
AI has now accelerated these questions into active legal disputes, with ongoing court cases examining whether large-scale data ingestion and AI training constitute lawful use of information or unlawful reproduction of protected expression.
Conclusion
Religious texts occupy a unique position in human society: they are spiritually central to believers, yet legally situated within a secular framework that only recognises human authorship and expression.
As a result, while sacred messages themselves are not “owned” in a copyright sense, the many human ways in which they are translated, interpreted, and presented remain protected forms of intellectual property.
Understanding this distinction is essential in navigating modern debates around copyright, artificial intelligence, and the ownership of knowledge.
As AI accelerates these debates, that distinction is becoming harder — and more important — than ever.
M Chatur 29 May 2026
Religious Texts, Authorship, and Copyright in the Modern World
A recurring question in copyright law is whether sacred or religious texts can be subject to ownership, especially where they are believed to originate from a divine source rather than a human author.
If a message is understood as being transmitted rather than personally authored — where the communicator is not the originator of the words but only the transmitter — then it raises a fundamental question for copyright law: can “authorship” exist in the legal sense at all?
This question becomes even more significant when considering texts that adherents believe to be divinely revealed rather than human-created.
Recent developments in artificial intelligence have brought renewed attention to these questions, as courts and policymakers are currently grappling with lawsuits and legal disputes concerning whether AI systems can lawfully use copyrighted material for training, and whether outputs derived from large-scale information processing may infringe copyright protections.
Copyright law, however, does not engage with questions of faith or metaphysical origin. It operates on a strictly legal definition of authorship: a work must result from human creative expression fixed in a tangible form.
This creates a conceptual tension when applied to religious scripture. In many faith traditions, sacred texts are understood not as human literary works, but as revelations transmitted through a messenger who is not regarded as the author of the message itself.
From a legal standpoint, however, copyright does not recognise divine origin as a category of authorship. The law neither affirms nor denies theological claims; it simply operates outside of them.
Religious texts and copyright status
In practice, original scriptural texts such as ancient religious manuscripts are generally treated as public domain works, particularly in their original languages.
This means the underlying text itself is not owned by any individual or organisation in a copyright sense.
However, copyright protection can and does apply to human contributions surrounding those texts, including:
* translations into other languages
* editorial commentary and interpretation
* annotated or scholarly editions
* formatting, typography, and layout of printed versions
* audio recordings and recitations
* digital applications and curated compilations
In each case, the law protects the human intellectual effort in expression, arrangement, and presentation, not the underlying sacred message itself.
Key legal principle
At the heart of copyright law is a simple but important distinction:
Copyright protects the expression created by humans — not the ideas, beliefs, facts, or meanings being expressed.
This principle allows sacred texts, scientific facts, historical accounts, and philosophical ideas to remain freely accessible, while still protecting the creative labour of translators, editors, publishers, and commentators.
Why this matters today
As artificial intelligence systems increasingly interact with vast bodies of human knowledge, this distinction becomes more important.
The central legal and ethical question is not whether information is true, sacred, or historical — but whether a system is reproducing protected human expression, or generating new output based on underlying ideas.
AI has now accelerated these questions into active legal disputes, with ongoing court cases examining whether large-scale data ingestion and AI training constitute lawful use of information or unlawful reproduction of protected expression.
Conclusion
Religious texts occupy a unique position in human society: they are spiritually central to believers, yet legally situated within a secular framework that only recognises human authorship and expression.
As a result, while sacred messages themselves are not “owned” in a copyright sense, the many human ways in which they are translated, interpreted, and presented remain protected forms of intellectual property.
Understanding this distinction is essential in navigating modern debates around copyright, artificial intelligence, and the ownership of knowledge.
As AI accelerates these debates, that distinction is becoming harder — and more important — than ever.
M Chatur 29 May 2026
-
mahebubchatur
- Posts: 831
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 7:01 pm
Ismaili Constitution 2025 - First signed by Shah Rahim Aga Khan V
Preamble to the Ismaili Constitution 2025
“ It is the desire and Hidayah of Mawlana Hazar Imam that the constitutions presently applicable to the Ismaili Muslims in different countries be superseded and that the Ismaili Muslims worldwide be given this Constitution…”
Preamble
“BISMI-LLAHI-R-RAHMANI-R-RAHIM
Whereas
* The Constitution of the Shia Imami Ismaili Muslims ordained on 13th December 1986 recites that Mawlana Hazar Imam enjoys full authority of governance over and in respect of all religious and Jamati matters of the Ismaili Muslims.
* The Ismaili Constitution states that Mawlana Hazar Imam has sole authority to amend any such Constitution or any provision thereof.
* It is the desire and hidāya of Mawlana Hazar Imam that the Ismaili Constitution be amended in certain respects.
Now therefore
By THIS CONSTITUTIONAL INSTRUMENT and in exercise of the inherent right and absolute and unfettered power and authority vested in me as Hazar Imam and recited in the Constitution of the Shia Imami Ismaili Muslims. I. SHAH RAHIM AL HUSSAINI AGA KHAN, holder of the office of the Ismaili Imamat, am pleased to ordain AND DO HEREBY ORDAIN that the Shia Imami Ismaili Muslims, in whatever place they may be, shall at all times be bound and governed by the Constitution hereinafter appearing which is a consolidation into one document of previous changes made to the Ismaili Constitution together with further changes ordained by this Constitutional Instrument and reflected in the reprinted consolidated Constitution hereinafter appearing which shall replace and supersede any previous Constitution applicable to the Ismaili Muslims.
ORDAINED under the Sign Manual and Seal of Mawlana Hazar Imam Shah Rahim al Hussaini His Highness Prince Aga Khan the Fiftieth hereditary Imam of the Shia Imami Ismaili Muslims.
at the Dewan of the Ismaili Imamat, Lisbon, Portugal this fleventh day of Februang
Two Thousand and Twenty-Five being
the Troelth day of Sha 'Ban
One Thousand Four Hundred and
Forty-Six (hijri), in the First year of his Imamat.
AgaKhan
Preamble (reflecting the Arabic transliterations then applicable) followed by the full text of the Ismaili Constitution incorporating changes ordained by the Constitutional Instrument made on the Eleventh day of February Iwo Thousand and Twenty-Five being the Twelfth day of Sha'bān One Thousand Four Hundred and Forty-Six (hijri).
More to follow
“ It is the desire and Hidayah of Mawlana Hazar Imam that the constitutions presently applicable to the Ismaili Muslims in different countries be superseded and that the Ismaili Muslims worldwide be given this Constitution…”
Preamble
“BISMI-LLAHI-R-RAHMANI-R-RAHIM
Whereas
* The Constitution of the Shia Imami Ismaili Muslims ordained on 13th December 1986 recites that Mawlana Hazar Imam enjoys full authority of governance over and in respect of all religious and Jamati matters of the Ismaili Muslims.
* The Ismaili Constitution states that Mawlana Hazar Imam has sole authority to amend any such Constitution or any provision thereof.
* It is the desire and hidāya of Mawlana Hazar Imam that the Ismaili Constitution be amended in certain respects.
Now therefore
By THIS CONSTITUTIONAL INSTRUMENT and in exercise of the inherent right and absolute and unfettered power and authority vested in me as Hazar Imam and recited in the Constitution of the Shia Imami Ismaili Muslims. I. SHAH RAHIM AL HUSSAINI AGA KHAN, holder of the office of the Ismaili Imamat, am pleased to ordain AND DO HEREBY ORDAIN that the Shia Imami Ismaili Muslims, in whatever place they may be, shall at all times be bound and governed by the Constitution hereinafter appearing which is a consolidation into one document of previous changes made to the Ismaili Constitution together with further changes ordained by this Constitutional Instrument and reflected in the reprinted consolidated Constitution hereinafter appearing which shall replace and supersede any previous Constitution applicable to the Ismaili Muslims.
ORDAINED under the Sign Manual and Seal of Mawlana Hazar Imam Shah Rahim al Hussaini His Highness Prince Aga Khan the Fiftieth hereditary Imam of the Shia Imami Ismaili Muslims.
at the Dewan of the Ismaili Imamat, Lisbon, Portugal this fleventh day of Februang
Two Thousand and Twenty-Five being
the Troelth day of Sha 'Ban
One Thousand Four Hundred and
Forty-Six (hijri), in the First year of his Imamat.
AgaKhan
Preamble (reflecting the Arabic transliterations then applicable) followed by the full text of the Ismaili Constitution incorporating changes ordained by the Constitutional Instrument made on the Eleventh day of February Iwo Thousand and Twenty-Five being the Twelfth day of Sha'bān One Thousand Four Hundred and Forty-Six (hijri).
More to follow
Re: Ismaili Constitution 2025 - First signed by Shah Rahim Aga Khan V
As Received:
Here is the PDF copy of the 2025 Ismaili Constitution.
PDF COPY Download Link: https://ismaili.net/timeline/2025/2025- ... tution.pdf
Here is the PDF copy of the 2025 Ismaili Constitution.
PDF COPY Download Link: https://ismaili.net/timeline/2025/2025- ... tution.pdf
-
mahebubchatur
- Posts: 831
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 7:01 pm
Ismaili Constitution 2025 - First signed by Shah Rahim Aga Khan V
Ismaili constitution 2025 -Study Series
International Conciliation and Arbitration Board and
CABS
This is at the following link
viewtopic.php?p=76466#p76466
International Conciliation and Arbitration Board and
CABS
This is at the following link
viewtopic.php?p=76466#p76466
-
mahebubchatur
- Posts: 831
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 7:01 pm
Ismaili Constitution 2025 - First signed by Shah Rahim Aga Khan V
Understanding the Ismaili Constitution 2025 – Study Series
Authority of Hazar Imam as Affirmed in the Ismaili Constitution 2025 –
A Farman
One of the most significant clarifications made by Hazar Imam in the Ismaili Constitution 2025 is the added emphasis used to affirm the authority of Hazar Imam.
In the Constitution, Hazar Imam states:
“Holy Prophet (S.A.S.) designated and appointed his cousin and son-in-law Hazrat Mawlana Ali Amiru-l-Mu’minin (Alayhi-s-salam), to be the first Imam to continue the Ta’wil and Ta’lim of Allah’s final message and to guide the murids, and proclaimed that the Imamat should continue by heredity.” (Preamble B)
“Holy Prophet (S.A.S.), through the divine revelation from Allah, prescribed rules governing spiritual and temporal matters.” (Preamble A)
In the 1998 Constitution, Hazar Imam affirmed the “authority vested in me” as Hazar Imam. (Preamble – Signing Paragraph)
In addition, “Hazar Imam enjoys full authority of governance over and in respect of all religious and Jamati matters of the Ismaili Muslims.” (Article 1). This is testified to by the offer of allegiance (Bay’ah) to the Imam by every murid and its acceptance by Hazar Imam.
In the 2025 Constitution, Hazar Imam clarifies this authority as the Imam’s “inherent right and absolute and unfettered power and authority vested in me as Hazar Imam.” (Preamble – Signing Paragraph)
This is more than a simple change in wording. It is a clear reaffirmation of the foundational doctrine of the Ismaili faith: the authority of the Imam does not originate from institutions, councils, constitutions, elections, appointments, or the collective will of the Jamat.
Rather, in the Constitution, Hazar Imam records an authority that already exists: the continuum of the bearer of the ever-present Light (Nur) from Allah, as designated and proclaimed by Prophet Muhammad.
The Preamble places the Constitution within the context of the faith and doctrine of the Shia Imami Ismaili Muslims, whose allegiance (Bay’ah) is to the Imam of the Time, designated by Allah through Prophet Muhammad to continue the Ta’lim and Ta’wil of the Qur’an.
The authority of the Imam is therefore rooted in the Nur of the Imam, and that authority originates from Allah.
From an Ismaili theological perspective, the flow of authority may be understood as:
Allah → Qur’an → Prophet Muhammad → Imam Ali → Continuum of Successive Ever-Present Hereditary Imams → Present Imam → Conveys Farmans, Blessings, and Mercy → Ismaili Constitution
The Constitution is ordained by Hazar Imam for the benefit and governance of the Jamat:
“Ismaili Muslims worldwide be given this Constitution in order better to secure their peace and unity, religious and social welfare, to foster fruitful collaboration between different peoples, to optimise the use of resources, and to enable the Ismaili Muslims to make a valid and meaningful contribution to the improvement of the quality of life of the Ummah and the societies in which they live.” (Preamble I)
This understanding is consistent with the Ismaili doctrine that the Imam is the bearer of the Nur and conveys guidance through Farmans in matters of faith and in spiritual and material matters.
As the Constitution further states:
“The Imam of the Time is concerned with spiritual advancement as well as improvement of the quality of life of his murids. The Imam’s Ta’lim lights the murids’ path to spiritual enlightenment and vision. In temporal matters, the Imam guides the murids.” (Preamble F)
The words used by the Imam in the 2025 Constitution, “inherent right,” are particularly significant.
An inherent right is one that belongs to a person or office by its very nature and does not depend upon being granted by another body.
Likewise, the words “absolute” and “unfettered” emphasize that the Imam’s authority, within the sphere of the Ismaili faith, is not derived from, nor subject to, approval by institutions operating under and subordinate to the Ismaili Constitution. Therefore, the Constitution is not for the Imam, nor does it apply to him, because it is, in fact, a Farman conveyed by the Imam to be shared, implemented, and upheld by every murid.
The Constitution itself does not create the Imam’s authority.
Rather, it is a Farman of the Imam that records, expresses, and provides a framework through which that authority is exercised and implemented within the Jamat.
A Farman is defined by Hazar Imam as:
“Any pronouncement, direction, order or ruling made or given by Mawlana Hazar Imam.” (Definitions)
The Constitution, therefore, is a Farman to be given to every murid, to be read alongside the Farmans, and in accordance with the principle that a later Farman prevails over an earlier Farman.
This clarification also helps to explain the meaning of Bay’ah (allegiance) in the context of the authority of the Imam.
Bay’ah is not the source of the Imam’s authority. The Imam does not become the Imam because murids give Bay’ah. Rather, murids give Bay’ah because he is already the Imam of the Time.
In other words:
“The authority of the Imam does not arise from Bay’ah; rather, Bay’ah arises because of the authority of the Imam from Allah and Allah’s will.”
Or, stated another way:
“The murid does not make the Imam the Imam by giving Bay’ah. The murid gives Bay’ah because the Imam is already the Imam.”
Bay’ah is therefore the murid’s acceptance of the Imam’s divine authority and the expression of allegiance to the living Imam. It is a sacred covenant and relationship, but it is not the source from which the Imam derives his authority.
This distinction is important because it also helps explain the relationship between the Imam and the institutions of the Jamat: Councils, Boards, ITREBs, Tariqah and Religious Education institutions, and all other Jamati institutions. Their purpose is to serve the Jamat.
The authority of constitutional institutions is delegated by the Imam under the Constitution.
The authority of the Imam is inherent and personal to the Imam as the bearer of the Nur.
When comparing the wording used by Hazar Imam in the 1998 and 2025 Constitutions, a reasonable interpretation is that the 2025 Constitution makes explicit what was previously implicit: namely, that the authority of the Imam is inherent to the ever-present Nur of the Imam, absolute and unfettered within its sphere, and not dependent upon any human institution, constitution, election, appointment, or act of allegiance for its existence.
The enhanced language of the 2025 Constitution can therefore be understood as a reaffirmation of a central Ismaili doctrine: authority flows from the Imam to the Jamat and its institutions, not from the institutions to the Imam.
The Constitution, a Farman in itself, records and reflects that reality while providing the framework through which the Imam’s Farmans are shared & implemented for the benefit of every member of the the global Jamat.
M Chatur 2 Jun 2026
Authority of Hazar Imam as Affirmed in the Ismaili Constitution 2025 –
A Farman
One of the most significant clarifications made by Hazar Imam in the Ismaili Constitution 2025 is the added emphasis used to affirm the authority of Hazar Imam.
In the Constitution, Hazar Imam states:
“Holy Prophet (S.A.S.) designated and appointed his cousin and son-in-law Hazrat Mawlana Ali Amiru-l-Mu’minin (Alayhi-s-salam), to be the first Imam to continue the Ta’wil and Ta’lim of Allah’s final message and to guide the murids, and proclaimed that the Imamat should continue by heredity.” (Preamble B)
“Holy Prophet (S.A.S.), through the divine revelation from Allah, prescribed rules governing spiritual and temporal matters.” (Preamble A)
In the 1998 Constitution, Hazar Imam affirmed the “authority vested in me” as Hazar Imam. (Preamble – Signing Paragraph)
In addition, “Hazar Imam enjoys full authority of governance over and in respect of all religious and Jamati matters of the Ismaili Muslims.” (Article 1). This is testified to by the offer of allegiance (Bay’ah) to the Imam by every murid and its acceptance by Hazar Imam.
In the 2025 Constitution, Hazar Imam clarifies this authority as the Imam’s “inherent right and absolute and unfettered power and authority vested in me as Hazar Imam.” (Preamble – Signing Paragraph)
This is more than a simple change in wording. It is a clear reaffirmation of the foundational doctrine of the Ismaili faith: the authority of the Imam does not originate from institutions, councils, constitutions, elections, appointments, or the collective will of the Jamat.
Rather, in the Constitution, Hazar Imam records an authority that already exists: the continuum of the bearer of the ever-present Light (Nur) from Allah, as designated and proclaimed by Prophet Muhammad.
The Preamble places the Constitution within the context of the faith and doctrine of the Shia Imami Ismaili Muslims, whose allegiance (Bay’ah) is to the Imam of the Time, designated by Allah through Prophet Muhammad to continue the Ta’lim and Ta’wil of the Qur’an.
The authority of the Imam is therefore rooted in the Nur of the Imam, and that authority originates from Allah.
From an Ismaili theological perspective, the flow of authority may be understood as:
Allah → Qur’an → Prophet Muhammad → Imam Ali → Continuum of Successive Ever-Present Hereditary Imams → Present Imam → Conveys Farmans, Blessings, and Mercy → Ismaili Constitution
The Constitution is ordained by Hazar Imam for the benefit and governance of the Jamat:
“Ismaili Muslims worldwide be given this Constitution in order better to secure their peace and unity, religious and social welfare, to foster fruitful collaboration between different peoples, to optimise the use of resources, and to enable the Ismaili Muslims to make a valid and meaningful contribution to the improvement of the quality of life of the Ummah and the societies in which they live.” (Preamble I)
This understanding is consistent with the Ismaili doctrine that the Imam is the bearer of the Nur and conveys guidance through Farmans in matters of faith and in spiritual and material matters.
As the Constitution further states:
“The Imam of the Time is concerned with spiritual advancement as well as improvement of the quality of life of his murids. The Imam’s Ta’lim lights the murids’ path to spiritual enlightenment and vision. In temporal matters, the Imam guides the murids.” (Preamble F)
The words used by the Imam in the 2025 Constitution, “inherent right,” are particularly significant.
An inherent right is one that belongs to a person or office by its very nature and does not depend upon being granted by another body.
Likewise, the words “absolute” and “unfettered” emphasize that the Imam’s authority, within the sphere of the Ismaili faith, is not derived from, nor subject to, approval by institutions operating under and subordinate to the Ismaili Constitution. Therefore, the Constitution is not for the Imam, nor does it apply to him, because it is, in fact, a Farman conveyed by the Imam to be shared, implemented, and upheld by every murid.
The Constitution itself does not create the Imam’s authority.
Rather, it is a Farman of the Imam that records, expresses, and provides a framework through which that authority is exercised and implemented within the Jamat.
A Farman is defined by Hazar Imam as:
“Any pronouncement, direction, order or ruling made or given by Mawlana Hazar Imam.” (Definitions)
The Constitution, therefore, is a Farman to be given to every murid, to be read alongside the Farmans, and in accordance with the principle that a later Farman prevails over an earlier Farman.
This clarification also helps to explain the meaning of Bay’ah (allegiance) in the context of the authority of the Imam.
Bay’ah is not the source of the Imam’s authority. The Imam does not become the Imam because murids give Bay’ah. Rather, murids give Bay’ah because he is already the Imam of the Time.
In other words:
“The authority of the Imam does not arise from Bay’ah; rather, Bay’ah arises because of the authority of the Imam from Allah and Allah’s will.”
Or, stated another way:
“The murid does not make the Imam the Imam by giving Bay’ah. The murid gives Bay’ah because the Imam is already the Imam.”
Bay’ah is therefore the murid’s acceptance of the Imam’s divine authority and the expression of allegiance to the living Imam. It is a sacred covenant and relationship, but it is not the source from which the Imam derives his authority.
This distinction is important because it also helps explain the relationship between the Imam and the institutions of the Jamat: Councils, Boards, ITREBs, Tariqah and Religious Education institutions, and all other Jamati institutions. Their purpose is to serve the Jamat.
The authority of constitutional institutions is delegated by the Imam under the Constitution.
The authority of the Imam is inherent and personal to the Imam as the bearer of the Nur.
When comparing the wording used by Hazar Imam in the 1998 and 2025 Constitutions, a reasonable interpretation is that the 2025 Constitution makes explicit what was previously implicit: namely, that the authority of the Imam is inherent to the ever-present Nur of the Imam, absolute and unfettered within its sphere, and not dependent upon any human institution, constitution, election, appointment, or act of allegiance for its existence.
The enhanced language of the 2025 Constitution can therefore be understood as a reaffirmation of a central Ismaili doctrine: authority flows from the Imam to the Jamat and its institutions, not from the institutions to the Imam.
The Constitution, a Farman in itself, records and reflects that reality while providing the framework through which the Imam’s Farmans are shared & implemented for the benefit of every member of the the global Jamat.
M Chatur 2 Jun 2026
-
mahebubchatur
- Posts: 831
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 7:01 pm
Ismaili Constitution 2025 - Anthem - First signed by Shah Rahim Aga Khan V
Understanding the Ismaili Constitution 2025
Study Series: The Nashid al-Imamah (Ismaili Anthem)
Introduction
Among the distinctive symbols of the Ismaili Imamat recognised in the Constitution is the Nashid al-Imamah, commonly known as the Ismaili Anthem.
Murids are familiar with hearing the Anthem or its melody at significant religious and community occasions. However, fewer may be aware that the Anthem is not merely a devotional composition. It is expressly recognised in the Constitution of the Shia Imami Ismaili Muslims and forms part of the constitutional identity of the Imamat and the global Jamat.
This study examines the constitutional status of the Ismaili Anthem, its historical background, and the significance of the constitutional changes between 1998 and 2025.
The Ismaili Anthem
Historical accounts attribute the composition of the Anthem to the poet Fazal Walli Nathoo “Dilgir” in Zanzibar in the early 1920s.
The Anthem originated as a devotional poem and act of prayer (dua and praise poetry) within a religious and spiritual literary tradition. At the time of its composition, it was not originally conceived as a formal “anthem” in the modern constitutional sense, but rather as a devotional composition expressing love, praise, and spiritual devotion.
Historical accounts further indicate that it was first heard publicly in 1929, when Mawlana Sultan Muhammad Shah (Aga Khan III) encountered the composition during a visit to Zanzibar. On hearing it, he is recorded in historical sources as having immediately recognised and acclaimed it as the Anthem of the Ismaili community.
From this point onward, the composition transitioned from a devotional poem into a recognised communal and ceremonial Anthem within the Jamat.
The Anthem became widely known as the Salaami or Nashid al-Imamah and has been recited on important Jamati occasions and also in the presence of the Imam and at major official gatherings and state visits.
The Ismaili Anthem contains references to:
The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him and his family);
Hazrat Ali;
Hazrat Bibi Fatima;
Imam Hasan;
Imam Husayn;
The Panjtan Pak;
The Imam of the Time.
The original text is written in a devotional style common to South Asian Muslim traditions of the period.
Original Text
Noore-Rasulillah-s bane ho Aga Khan,
Shah Karim Shah, tu ho Sahibuz-Zaman;
Mushkil Kusha-ke pyare, Jannat-e-Khatun-ke tare,
Hasan Husayn-ke sare, Noor-se ho khandan;
Panj-Tan ke ho sartaj, Kayam hai tera raj,
Juga juga jive tum-ji shan, Muridon hai sab tere gulam,
Sar juka kar karte hai salam.
Contemporary English Translation
You are Aga Khan (the Imam of the Time) through the same Divine Light (Noor) bestowed through the Prophet of Allah.
O Imam, you are the Imam of the Time and a source of guidance and mercy.
Beloved of the Mushkil Kusha and descendant of the noble family of the Prophet, your lineage proceeds through Imam Hasan and Imam Husayn.
Your authority continues through the blessed succession of the Panjtan Pak: Prophet Muhammad, Hazrat Ali, Hazrat Bibi Fatima, Imam Hasan, and Imam Husayn.
May your spiritual authority and guidance endure throughout all ages.
Your murids are devoted to your guidance and remain faithful to the Bay’ah they have given to you.
With bowed heads, we offer our respectful salutation.
Constitutional Recognition in the 2025 Constitution
Article 5.2 of the 2025 Constitution provides:
“Mawlana Hazar Imam has designated the nashid al-imama (Ismaili anthem) having such score and subject to such code as to the usage thereof as may be prescribed from time to time by Mawlana Hazar Imam.”
Several important observations arise from this provision:
The Anthem exists because it has been designated by Mawlana Hazar Imam.
The Anthem remains under the authority of Mawlana Hazar Imam.
The Anthem is recognised alongside the Imamat Crest and Personal Standard as an official symbol of the Imamat.
The Constitution refers specifically to the Anthem’s score (musical composition or melody).
The Anthem is subject to such code (rules governing its use) as may be prescribed from time to time by Mawlana Hazar Imam.
Constitutional Recognition in the 1998 Constitution
Article 16.2(b) of the 1998 Constitution provided:
“There shall be the Nashid al-Imamah (Ismaili anthem) having such lyrics and score and which shall be subject to such code as to the usage thereof as may be prescribed from time to time by Mawlana Hazar Imam.”
The 1998 Constitution therefore expressly referred to both:
Lyrics; and
Score.
The Anthem was also recognised alongside the Ismaili Flag as part of the history and tradition of the Jamat.
A Significant Constitutional Change
One of the most notable changes between the 1998 and 2025 Constitutions is the removal of the word “lyrics.”
1998 Constitution
“having such lyrics and score”
2025 Constitution
“having such score”
The omission of the word “lyrics” appears deliberate.
Several observations may be made:
The Constitution now focuses upon the Anthem’s musical composition or melody.
Greater emphasis may be placed upon the Anthem as a ceremonial and constitutional symbol.
The change may allow flexibility regarding language, translation, or textual presentation while preserving the recognised melody.
The original Anthem contains devotional terminology that can be difficult to translate accurately into contemporary English.
For example, the word “gulam” is often translated literally as “slave.” However, in the context of classical South Asian devotional literature, it frequently conveys meanings closer to devotion, allegiance, service, humility, loyalty, and obedience rather than slavery in its modern legal sense.
Historical and linguistic changes can therefore create challenges when translating devotional texts from one period and culture into another.
Whether the removal of the word “lyrics” from the 2025 Constitution was intended to address such issues, or was made for entirely different reasons, is not explained in the Constitution itself.
This raises a legitimate constitutional question for students of the Constitution:
Was the omission of the word “lyrics” deliberate, and if so, what annotations or guidance (if any) were provided by Mawlana Hazar Imam that led to this constitutional change?
The Anthem and the Constitutional Symbols of the Imamat
The 2025 Constitution places the Anthem alongside:
The Imamat Crest; and
The Personal Standard.
The 1998 Constitution similarly associated the Anthem with:
The Imamat Crest;
The Personal Standard; and
The Ismaili Flag.
This positioning suggests that the Anthem is more than a devotional hymn. It functions as one of the recognised constitutional symbols of the Imamat and the Jamat.
Just as a national anthem expresses identity and allegiance within a nation-state, the Nashid al-Imamah expresses the spiritual relationship between the murid and the Imam of the Time.
Constitutional Authority Over the Anthem
Both the 1998 and 2025 Constitutions make clear that:
The Anthem exists under the authority of Mawlana Hazar Imam.
The use of the Anthem is subject to codes prescribed by Mawlana Hazar Imam.
The Constitution does not place authority over the Anthem in any council, board, committee, or institution.
Ultimate authority regarding the Anthem remains vested in Mawlana Hazar Imam.
This reflects the broader constitutional principle that the symbols of the Imamat derive their authority directly from the Imam
Questions for Reflection
Why does the Constitution place the Anthem alongside the Imamat Crest and Personal Standard?
What is the significance of the removal of the word “lyrics” from the 2025 Constitution?
Does the constitutional focus on the score indicate that the Anthem is now primarily recognised through its melody rather than its text?
How should historical devotional language be understood when translated into contemporary English?
Would an authorised commentary on the constitutional change assist murids in understanding the evolution of this important symbol of the Imamat?
Conclusion
The Nashid al-Imamah occupies a unique place within the constitutional framework of the Ismaili Imamat.
The Constitution recognises it not merely as a devotional composition but as an official symbol of the Imamat, subject to the authority and guidance of Mawlana Hazar Imam.
The transition from the 1998 wording — “lyrics and score” — to the 2025 wording — “score” — represents one of the more interesting constitutional developments relating to the symbols of the Imam and Imamat.
As the Constitution itself does not explain the reason for this change, it remains an appropriate subject for respectful study, reflection, and, where appropriate, requests for authorised clarifications.
A request has also been made to the leadership for any official explanations, annotations, or institutional records relating to this change, including clarification on whether the omission of the word ‘lyrics’ in the 2025 Constitution was intentional by Hazar Imam and, not an administration error.
M Chatur
Study Series: The Nashid al-Imamah (Ismaili Anthem)
Introduction
Among the distinctive symbols of the Ismaili Imamat recognised in the Constitution is the Nashid al-Imamah, commonly known as the Ismaili Anthem.
Murids are familiar with hearing the Anthem or its melody at significant religious and community occasions. However, fewer may be aware that the Anthem is not merely a devotional composition. It is expressly recognised in the Constitution of the Shia Imami Ismaili Muslims and forms part of the constitutional identity of the Imamat and the global Jamat.
This study examines the constitutional status of the Ismaili Anthem, its historical background, and the significance of the constitutional changes between 1998 and 2025.
The Ismaili Anthem
Historical accounts attribute the composition of the Anthem to the poet Fazal Walli Nathoo “Dilgir” in Zanzibar in the early 1920s.
The Anthem originated as a devotional poem and act of prayer (dua and praise poetry) within a religious and spiritual literary tradition. At the time of its composition, it was not originally conceived as a formal “anthem” in the modern constitutional sense, but rather as a devotional composition expressing love, praise, and spiritual devotion.
Historical accounts further indicate that it was first heard publicly in 1929, when Mawlana Sultan Muhammad Shah (Aga Khan III) encountered the composition during a visit to Zanzibar. On hearing it, he is recorded in historical sources as having immediately recognised and acclaimed it as the Anthem of the Ismaili community.
From this point onward, the composition transitioned from a devotional poem into a recognised communal and ceremonial Anthem within the Jamat.
The Anthem became widely known as the Salaami or Nashid al-Imamah and has been recited on important Jamati occasions and also in the presence of the Imam and at major official gatherings and state visits.
The Ismaili Anthem contains references to:
The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him and his family);
Hazrat Ali;
Hazrat Bibi Fatima;
Imam Hasan;
Imam Husayn;
The Panjtan Pak;
The Imam of the Time.
The original text is written in a devotional style common to South Asian Muslim traditions of the period.
Original Text
Noore-Rasulillah-s bane ho Aga Khan,
Shah Karim Shah, tu ho Sahibuz-Zaman;
Mushkil Kusha-ke pyare, Jannat-e-Khatun-ke tare,
Hasan Husayn-ke sare, Noor-se ho khandan;
Panj-Tan ke ho sartaj, Kayam hai tera raj,
Juga juga jive tum-ji shan, Muridon hai sab tere gulam,
Sar juka kar karte hai salam.
Contemporary English Translation
You are Aga Khan (the Imam of the Time) through the same Divine Light (Noor) bestowed through the Prophet of Allah.
O Imam, you are the Imam of the Time and a source of guidance and mercy.
Beloved of the Mushkil Kusha and descendant of the noble family of the Prophet, your lineage proceeds through Imam Hasan and Imam Husayn.
Your authority continues through the blessed succession of the Panjtan Pak: Prophet Muhammad, Hazrat Ali, Hazrat Bibi Fatima, Imam Hasan, and Imam Husayn.
May your spiritual authority and guidance endure throughout all ages.
Your murids are devoted to your guidance and remain faithful to the Bay’ah they have given to you.
With bowed heads, we offer our respectful salutation.
Constitutional Recognition in the 2025 Constitution
Article 5.2 of the 2025 Constitution provides:
“Mawlana Hazar Imam has designated the nashid al-imama (Ismaili anthem) having such score and subject to such code as to the usage thereof as may be prescribed from time to time by Mawlana Hazar Imam.”
Several important observations arise from this provision:
The Anthem exists because it has been designated by Mawlana Hazar Imam.
The Anthem remains under the authority of Mawlana Hazar Imam.
The Anthem is recognised alongside the Imamat Crest and Personal Standard as an official symbol of the Imamat.
The Constitution refers specifically to the Anthem’s score (musical composition or melody).
The Anthem is subject to such code (rules governing its use) as may be prescribed from time to time by Mawlana Hazar Imam.
Constitutional Recognition in the 1998 Constitution
Article 16.2(b) of the 1998 Constitution provided:
“There shall be the Nashid al-Imamah (Ismaili anthem) having such lyrics and score and which shall be subject to such code as to the usage thereof as may be prescribed from time to time by Mawlana Hazar Imam.”
The 1998 Constitution therefore expressly referred to both:
Lyrics; and
Score.
The Anthem was also recognised alongside the Ismaili Flag as part of the history and tradition of the Jamat.
A Significant Constitutional Change
One of the most notable changes between the 1998 and 2025 Constitutions is the removal of the word “lyrics.”
1998 Constitution
“having such lyrics and score”
2025 Constitution
“having such score”
The omission of the word “lyrics” appears deliberate.
Several observations may be made:
The Constitution now focuses upon the Anthem’s musical composition or melody.
Greater emphasis may be placed upon the Anthem as a ceremonial and constitutional symbol.
The change may allow flexibility regarding language, translation, or textual presentation while preserving the recognised melody.
The original Anthem contains devotional terminology that can be difficult to translate accurately into contemporary English.
For example, the word “gulam” is often translated literally as “slave.” However, in the context of classical South Asian devotional literature, it frequently conveys meanings closer to devotion, allegiance, service, humility, loyalty, and obedience rather than slavery in its modern legal sense.
Historical and linguistic changes can therefore create challenges when translating devotional texts from one period and culture into another.
Whether the removal of the word “lyrics” from the 2025 Constitution was intended to address such issues, or was made for entirely different reasons, is not explained in the Constitution itself.
This raises a legitimate constitutional question for students of the Constitution:
Was the omission of the word “lyrics” deliberate, and if so, what annotations or guidance (if any) were provided by Mawlana Hazar Imam that led to this constitutional change?
The Anthem and the Constitutional Symbols of the Imamat
The 2025 Constitution places the Anthem alongside:
The Imamat Crest; and
The Personal Standard.
The 1998 Constitution similarly associated the Anthem with:
The Imamat Crest;
The Personal Standard; and
The Ismaili Flag.
This positioning suggests that the Anthem is more than a devotional hymn. It functions as one of the recognised constitutional symbols of the Imamat and the Jamat.
Just as a national anthem expresses identity and allegiance within a nation-state, the Nashid al-Imamah expresses the spiritual relationship between the murid and the Imam of the Time.
Constitutional Authority Over the Anthem
Both the 1998 and 2025 Constitutions make clear that:
The Anthem exists under the authority of Mawlana Hazar Imam.
The use of the Anthem is subject to codes prescribed by Mawlana Hazar Imam.
The Constitution does not place authority over the Anthem in any council, board, committee, or institution.
Ultimate authority regarding the Anthem remains vested in Mawlana Hazar Imam.
This reflects the broader constitutional principle that the symbols of the Imamat derive their authority directly from the Imam
Questions for Reflection
Why does the Constitution place the Anthem alongside the Imamat Crest and Personal Standard?
What is the significance of the removal of the word “lyrics” from the 2025 Constitution?
Does the constitutional focus on the score indicate that the Anthem is now primarily recognised through its melody rather than its text?
How should historical devotional language be understood when translated into contemporary English?
Would an authorised commentary on the constitutional change assist murids in understanding the evolution of this important symbol of the Imamat?
Conclusion
The Nashid al-Imamah occupies a unique place within the constitutional framework of the Ismaili Imamat.
The Constitution recognises it not merely as a devotional composition but as an official symbol of the Imamat, subject to the authority and guidance of Mawlana Hazar Imam.
The transition from the 1998 wording — “lyrics and score” — to the 2025 wording — “score” — represents one of the more interesting constitutional developments relating to the symbols of the Imam and Imamat.
As the Constitution itself does not explain the reason for this change, it remains an appropriate subject for respectful study, reflection, and, where appropriate, requests for authorised clarifications.
A request has also been made to the leadership for any official explanations, annotations, or institutional records relating to this change, including clarification on whether the omission of the word ‘lyrics’ in the 2025 Constitution was intentional by Hazar Imam and, not an administration error.
M Chatur
-
mahebubchatur
- Posts: 831
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 7:01 pm
Ismaili Constitution 2025 - Study Series
Understanding the Ismaili Constitution 2025 – Study Series
The Ismaili Imamat, the Imam, and the Diwan of the Ismaili Imamat
The Ismaili Constitution is ordained by the Imam and forms part of the constitutional framework governing the affairs of the Jamat. The Constitution is to be read together with Farmans, and where there is a conflict in or between the constitution and Farmans, a later Farman prevails. The Constitution also recognises the law of the land and that prevails.
The 2025 Constitution contains important clarifications regarding the distinction between the Imam, the Ismaili Imamat, and the Diwan of the Ismaili Imamat. While these are closely connected, they are not identical.
1. The Imam and the Ismaili Imamat
The Constitution defines the Ismaili Imamat as:
“The institution or office of the Imam of the Shia Imami Ismaili Muslim.”
This definition is significant. The Constitution does not define the Ismaili Imamat as the individual person of the Imam. Rather, it defines the Imamat as the institution or office through which the authority, continuity, and responsibilities of the Imamate are exercised under the Constitution.
Mawlana Hazar Imam is the hereditary spiritual leader of the Shia Imami Ismaili Muslims, providing religious interpretation and guidance through Farmans.
The Ismaili Imamat is the enduring institution that represents the continuity of the Imamate from the time of Hazrat Ali and the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him and his family) through the succession of Imams to the present day.
As Mawlana Hazar Imam, Prince Karim Aga Khan IV, explained:
“Ismaili Imamat is a supra-national entity, representing the succession of Imams since the time of the Prophet Muhammad. The role of the Ismaili Imam is a spiritual one; his authority is that of religious interpretation.”
This distinction helps explain how the Ismaili Imamat, as a body, can enter into agreements, maintain diplomatic relations, establish delegations, and undertake institutional functions while the Imam continues to exercise his divinely ordained spiritual authority as the designated Imam of the Time.
2. The Ismaili Imamat as a Constitutional and Legal Entity
The Constitution establishes the Ismaili Imamat as a supranational institution operating under inherent Imamat authority, historical right, and ancestral tradition.
Article 6 authorises Mawlana Hazar Imam to:
* Enter into treaties, agreements, accords, conventions, and memoranda of understanding with states, governments, and international organisations.
* Appoint ambassadors, envoys, representatives, and delegations.
* Establish Delegations of the Ismaili Imamat to represent the Imamat in public, diplomatic, and institutional affairs.
Examples identified in the Constitution include:
* The Canada Delegation of the Ismaili Imamat in Ottawa.
* The Portugal Delegation of the Ismaili Imamat in Lisbon.
These constitutional provisions demonstrate that the Ismaili Imamat functions as a recognised institutional entity capable of maintaining formal relationships with governments and international bodies.
The Agreement between the Portuguese Republic and the Ismaili Imamat provides a contemporary example of this distinction. The agreement recognises the Ismaili Imamat as an institution with an international presence and establishes its Seat in Portugal while also recognising the spiritual and hereditary role of the Imam of the Time.
3. The Diwan of the Ismaili Imamat
The Constitution separately identifies the Diwan of the Ismaili Imamat.
Article 4.2 states that the existing Seat, known as the Diwan of the Ismaili Imamat, acts as a locus for the Imamat for:
* Its engagement with the Jamat.
* Its wider institutional interactions, diplomatic relations, and discourse.
* Its endeavours to foster human flourishing.
* Such other purposes as Mawlana Hazar Imam may determine.
The First Schedule identifies the current Seat as:
Diwan of the Ismaili Imamat
Rua Marquês de Fronteira
Lisbon, Portugal
The Diwan should therefore be understood as the constitutional Seat of the Ismaili Imamat. It is not the Imam himself.
Rather, it is the institutional centre through which the Ismaili Imamat carries out constitutional, diplomatic, administrative, and representational functions for the benefit and service of the Jamat.
4. Guidance and Implementation
A useful way to understand the relationship is:
* The Imam provides spiritual authority, guidance, and Farmans.
* The Ismaili Imamat is the institution through which the continuity and responsibilities of the Imamate are exercised.
* The Diwan of the Ismaili Imamat serves as the constitutional Seat and institutional locus of the Imamat.
* The institutions of the Jamat implement Farmans, including policies and constitutional provisions established by the Imam.
This distinction does not separate the institutions from the Imam. Rather, it clarifies their respective roles.
The institutions derive their authority from the Imam and operate under his guidance while carrying out legal, administrative, diplomatic, educational, social, and development functions for the benefit of the Jamat.
5. Why This Distinction Matters
Understanding these distinctions helps explain:
* How the Ismaili Imamat can enter into international agreements.
* How delegations and diplomatic representatives can be appointed.
* How intellectual property can belong to the Ismaili Imamat as a constitutional body.
* How constitutional institutions operate under the authority of the Imam while remaining distinct from the Imam as an individual person.
* How the Imamat engages with states and international organisations while the Imam’s primary authority remains spiritual and religious.
It also helps to appreciate that the Constitution describes both the authority of the Imam and institutional governance, both operating for the benefit of the Jamat.
The Imam remains the source of authority, while the Ismaili Imamat and its constitutional bodies provide the institutional framework through which that authority is exercised in service of the Jamat and broader goals of human dignity, pluralism, peace, and human flourishing.
6. Intellectual Property and the Distinction Between the Imam and the Ismaili Imamat
Article 23.4 provides another important example of the Constitution distinguishing between Mawlana Hazar Imam and the Ismaili Imamat.
The Article requires that any display or use of the Imam’s image, photograph, persona, voice, writings, or heritage must preserve the dignity of Mawlana Hazar Imam and must not infringe the intellectual property of either “Mawlana Hazar Imam” or “the Ismaili Imamat.”
This wording is significant because it recognises two related but distinct holders of rights and responsibilities. The Constitution does not treat the Imam and the Ismaili Imamat as identical terms. Rather, it refers separately to the Imam as the hereditary spiritual authority and to the Ismaili Imamat as the enduring institutional office of the Imamate.
This distinction is consistent with other constitutional provisions relating to the Seat of the Ismaili Imamat, the Diwan of the Ismaili Imamat, diplomatic practice, delegations, and institutional governance.
Article 23.4 does not prohibit the use of the Imam’s image, voice, writings, or heritage. Rather, it sets out conditions governing such use, requiring that it remain consistent with dignity and not be used for commercial exploitation, advertising, publicity, propaganda, or similar purposes that would infringe the intellectual property rights of either Mawlana Hazar Imam or the Ismaili Imamat.
The Article therefore reflects a broader formulation than that found in the 1998 Constitution. Whereas the earlier Constitution focused primarily on the protection of the Imam’s name, symbols, flags, and photographs, the 2025 Constitution expressly includes persona, voice, writings, heritage, and intellectual property protections for both the Imam and the Ismaili Imamat.
From a doctrinal perspective within the Ismaili tradition, Farmans occupy a distinct and unique position. Mawlana Hazar Imam has stated:
“The fundamental principles and values of our faith have not changed. We learn them from the Qur’an, from the example of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and from the Farmans of the Imams.”
— Imam Shah Rahim al-Husayni (a.s.), 27 August 2025
In this context, Farmans are understood by murids as spiritual guidance conveyed through the authority of the Imam, rooted in Qur’anic principles and the continuity of the Imamate. This theological framing is distinct from, but may intersect with, questions of institutional administration and intellectual property as understood in modern legal frameworks.
For this reason, some murids may distinguish between intellectual property protections applied to institutional, administrative, educational, commercial, or representational materials, and the dissemination of Farmans as religious guidance intended for the spiritual and material benefit of the Jamat.
Whatever interpretive approach is taken, Article 23.4 clearly demonstrates that the Constitution recognises both Mawlana Hazar Imam and the Ismaili Imamat as distinct entities whose dignity, heritage, writings, and intellectual property are to be respected and protected.
Study Reflections
When reading the 2025 Constitution, it is helpful to ask:
* Is a provision referring to the Imam personally?
* Is it referring to the institution of the Ismaili Imamat?
* Is it referring to a constitutional body such as the Diwan of the Ismaili Imamat or a Delegation of the Ismaili Imamat?
The Constitution frequently distinguishes between these concepts. Understanding those distinctions provides a clearer picture of how the Imam’s guidance, Farmans, constitutional governance, diplomacy, and institutional administration operate together within the contemporary Ismaili tradition for the spiritual and material benefit of the Jamat.
A request has been submitted to the Leaders for any comments or clarification. If received they will be shared in this forum too.
References and Caveats
Primary Sources
1. Constitution 2025 – Global Constitution.
2. Farmans of Mawlana Hazar Imam.
3. Ismaili Imamat official publications and website.
Caveats and Limitations
1. The amended National Constitutions, Rules and Regulations referred to in the 2025 Constitution have not all been made publicly available. Requests for access remain outstanding.
2. Not all Farmans have been made available to murids in every jurisdiction. Readers should therefore be aware that this study is based upon the materials currently available.
3. This study is intended as an educational analysis of constitutional texts and publicly available sources. Readers should consult original constitutional documents, Farmans, and official publications wherever possible.
Relevant Source Quotations
The following extracts are reproduced for reference and study purposes:
Constitution 2025 – Definition of the Seat of the Ismaili Imamat
“The existing Seat of the Ismaili Imamat as provided in Article 4, and more particularly described in the First Schedule.”
Constitution 2025 – Definition of the Ismaili Imamat
“The institution or office of the Imam of the Shia Imami Ismaili Muslim.”
Constitution 2025 – Article 4: Seat of the Ismaili Imamat
Article Four SEAT OF THE ISMAILI IMAMAT
4.1 In accordance with inherent Imamat authority, historical right and ancestral
adition, Mawlana Hazar Imam may designate one or more Seats of the Ismai
namat, for such purpose and for such duration as Mawlana Hazar Imam ma
determine.
4.2 The existing Seat, known as the Diwan of the Ismaili Imamat as more particularly
described in the First Schedule, acts as a locus for the Imamat for:
(a) its engagement with the Jamat;
(b) its wider institutional interactions, diplomatic relations and discourse;
(c) its endeavours t o foster human flourishing; and
(d) such other purposes as Mawlana Hazar Imam may determine.
Constitution 2025 – Article 6: Diplomatic Practice
Article Six DIPLOMATIC PRACTICE
In accordance with inherent Imamat authority, historical right and ancestral
tradition, Mawlana Hazar Imam may:
6.1 enter into treaties, conventions, charters, agreements, accords, protocols
and memoranda of understanding with states, governments, international
organisations and such other authorities as Mawlana Hazar Imam may
determine;
6.2 appoint Personal Representatives, Senior Officials, ambassadors, envoys,
delegations, or other representatives t o states, governments, international
organisations and such other authorities as Mawlana Hazar Imam may
determine, with such accreditation and guidelines a s may be conferred from
time t o time b y Mawlana Hazar Imam and who shall hold office for such period
a s Mawlana Hazar Imam may determine; and
6.3 designate as a "Delegation of the Ismaili Imamat" institutions established
to serve a representational role for the Imamat, for building relationships,
enabling diplomacy and public engagement, reflecting the spiritual dimensions
of Islam and the endeavours of the Imamat for human progress, the existing
such Delegations being more particularly described in the Fourth Schedule.
Constitution 2025 – Article 23.4
23.4 Display o f Mawlana Hazar Imam's image, photograph o r persona, or rendition
o f his voice, writings or heritage, in each case through any medium including
digital, electronic, print, or recorded media or in any format, in domestic or commercial premises, shall b e in keeping with the dignity of Mawlana Hazar Imam and shall not be such as to allow the display or rendition to lend itself
to commercial, advertising, publicity, propaganda or similar purposes or in any way to infringe the intellectual property of Mawlana Hazar Imam or the
Ismaili Imamat. The requirements of this Article shall extend to and include
any period prior to Mawlana Hazar Imam's accession to the Ismaili Imamat and in equal measure to any of his predecessors both before and after their accession to the Ismaili Imamat.
Prince Karim Aga Khan IV – Parliament of Canada, 2014
“Ismaili Imamat is a supra-national entity, representing the succession of Imams since the time of the Prophet Muhammad.
The role of the Ismaili Imam is a spiritual one; his authority is that of religious interpretation.”
Lisbon Interview, July 2018
“AC: I would also like to ask you what the Portuguese can expect, by having the Seat of the Ismaili Imamat in Lisbon?
When problems arise, and they are not here, but they arise in other countries, it is when religious institutions and national goals are not compatible. That is when we have trouble. However, Portugal has been very smart to work with religious institutions. We are not the only religion with which the Government works.
AK: Well … the context is between the relationship between religious institutions and modern governance. This is the real context. A context in which religious institutions are improved in what they do, that is, they need a safe environment to enable them to function. These institutions, such as humanitarian institutions, have taken on certain objectives and developed their civil society capacity. And it is very important that country laws allow religious institutions to thrive, as it is even in the national interest. And Portugal is the ideal country for this relationship and has been extremely considerate to me, as Imam.
I think the country has been very intelligent, in what concerns the building of bridges so that religions work well and always with a result that is of national interest. When problems arise, and they are not here, but they arise in other countries, it is when religious institutions and national goals are not compatible. That is when we have trouble. However, Portugal has been very smart to work with religious institutions. We are not the only religion with which the Government works. There is a very, very strong national precedent for this relationship to work. As a religion, we are working in the domain that is already very well positioned for the two sides to work together and as it should be. We are very grateful and honoured for that.”
Aga Khan Interview July 2018
viewtopic.php?p=63707&sid=ef2ab0169080f ... 3cf#p63707
Diwan of the Ismaili Imamat Ordination – 11 July 2018
Hazar Imam ordained in a Firman, the "Diwan of the Ismaili Imamat", and signed the constitutional legal instrument on 11 July 2018
Link to the video
http://ismaili.net/timeline/2018/2018-0 ... -didar.mov
Link
http://www.ismaili.net/html/modules.php ... 3583#63583
The Ismaili Imamat, the Imam, and the Diwan of the Ismaili Imamat
The Ismaili Constitution is ordained by the Imam and forms part of the constitutional framework governing the affairs of the Jamat. The Constitution is to be read together with Farmans, and where there is a conflict in or between the constitution and Farmans, a later Farman prevails. The Constitution also recognises the law of the land and that prevails.
The 2025 Constitution contains important clarifications regarding the distinction between the Imam, the Ismaili Imamat, and the Diwan of the Ismaili Imamat. While these are closely connected, they are not identical.
1. The Imam and the Ismaili Imamat
The Constitution defines the Ismaili Imamat as:
“The institution or office of the Imam of the Shia Imami Ismaili Muslim.”
This definition is significant. The Constitution does not define the Ismaili Imamat as the individual person of the Imam. Rather, it defines the Imamat as the institution or office through which the authority, continuity, and responsibilities of the Imamate are exercised under the Constitution.
Mawlana Hazar Imam is the hereditary spiritual leader of the Shia Imami Ismaili Muslims, providing religious interpretation and guidance through Farmans.
The Ismaili Imamat is the enduring institution that represents the continuity of the Imamate from the time of Hazrat Ali and the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him and his family) through the succession of Imams to the present day.
As Mawlana Hazar Imam, Prince Karim Aga Khan IV, explained:
“Ismaili Imamat is a supra-national entity, representing the succession of Imams since the time of the Prophet Muhammad. The role of the Ismaili Imam is a spiritual one; his authority is that of religious interpretation.”
This distinction helps explain how the Ismaili Imamat, as a body, can enter into agreements, maintain diplomatic relations, establish delegations, and undertake institutional functions while the Imam continues to exercise his divinely ordained spiritual authority as the designated Imam of the Time.
2. The Ismaili Imamat as a Constitutional and Legal Entity
The Constitution establishes the Ismaili Imamat as a supranational institution operating under inherent Imamat authority, historical right, and ancestral tradition.
Article 6 authorises Mawlana Hazar Imam to:
* Enter into treaties, agreements, accords, conventions, and memoranda of understanding with states, governments, and international organisations.
* Appoint ambassadors, envoys, representatives, and delegations.
* Establish Delegations of the Ismaili Imamat to represent the Imamat in public, diplomatic, and institutional affairs.
Examples identified in the Constitution include:
* The Canada Delegation of the Ismaili Imamat in Ottawa.
* The Portugal Delegation of the Ismaili Imamat in Lisbon.
These constitutional provisions demonstrate that the Ismaili Imamat functions as a recognised institutional entity capable of maintaining formal relationships with governments and international bodies.
The Agreement between the Portuguese Republic and the Ismaili Imamat provides a contemporary example of this distinction. The agreement recognises the Ismaili Imamat as an institution with an international presence and establishes its Seat in Portugal while also recognising the spiritual and hereditary role of the Imam of the Time.
3. The Diwan of the Ismaili Imamat
The Constitution separately identifies the Diwan of the Ismaili Imamat.
Article 4.2 states that the existing Seat, known as the Diwan of the Ismaili Imamat, acts as a locus for the Imamat for:
* Its engagement with the Jamat.
* Its wider institutional interactions, diplomatic relations, and discourse.
* Its endeavours to foster human flourishing.
* Such other purposes as Mawlana Hazar Imam may determine.
The First Schedule identifies the current Seat as:
Diwan of the Ismaili Imamat
Rua Marquês de Fronteira
Lisbon, Portugal
The Diwan should therefore be understood as the constitutional Seat of the Ismaili Imamat. It is not the Imam himself.
Rather, it is the institutional centre through which the Ismaili Imamat carries out constitutional, diplomatic, administrative, and representational functions for the benefit and service of the Jamat.
4. Guidance and Implementation
A useful way to understand the relationship is:
* The Imam provides spiritual authority, guidance, and Farmans.
* The Ismaili Imamat is the institution through which the continuity and responsibilities of the Imamate are exercised.
* The Diwan of the Ismaili Imamat serves as the constitutional Seat and institutional locus of the Imamat.
* The institutions of the Jamat implement Farmans, including policies and constitutional provisions established by the Imam.
This distinction does not separate the institutions from the Imam. Rather, it clarifies their respective roles.
The institutions derive their authority from the Imam and operate under his guidance while carrying out legal, administrative, diplomatic, educational, social, and development functions for the benefit of the Jamat.
5. Why This Distinction Matters
Understanding these distinctions helps explain:
* How the Ismaili Imamat can enter into international agreements.
* How delegations and diplomatic representatives can be appointed.
* How intellectual property can belong to the Ismaili Imamat as a constitutional body.
* How constitutional institutions operate under the authority of the Imam while remaining distinct from the Imam as an individual person.
* How the Imamat engages with states and international organisations while the Imam’s primary authority remains spiritual and religious.
It also helps to appreciate that the Constitution describes both the authority of the Imam and institutional governance, both operating for the benefit of the Jamat.
The Imam remains the source of authority, while the Ismaili Imamat and its constitutional bodies provide the institutional framework through which that authority is exercised in service of the Jamat and broader goals of human dignity, pluralism, peace, and human flourishing.
6. Intellectual Property and the Distinction Between the Imam and the Ismaili Imamat
Article 23.4 provides another important example of the Constitution distinguishing between Mawlana Hazar Imam and the Ismaili Imamat.
The Article requires that any display or use of the Imam’s image, photograph, persona, voice, writings, or heritage must preserve the dignity of Mawlana Hazar Imam and must not infringe the intellectual property of either “Mawlana Hazar Imam” or “the Ismaili Imamat.”
This wording is significant because it recognises two related but distinct holders of rights and responsibilities. The Constitution does not treat the Imam and the Ismaili Imamat as identical terms. Rather, it refers separately to the Imam as the hereditary spiritual authority and to the Ismaili Imamat as the enduring institutional office of the Imamate.
This distinction is consistent with other constitutional provisions relating to the Seat of the Ismaili Imamat, the Diwan of the Ismaili Imamat, diplomatic practice, delegations, and institutional governance.
Article 23.4 does not prohibit the use of the Imam’s image, voice, writings, or heritage. Rather, it sets out conditions governing such use, requiring that it remain consistent with dignity and not be used for commercial exploitation, advertising, publicity, propaganda, or similar purposes that would infringe the intellectual property rights of either Mawlana Hazar Imam or the Ismaili Imamat.
The Article therefore reflects a broader formulation than that found in the 1998 Constitution. Whereas the earlier Constitution focused primarily on the protection of the Imam’s name, symbols, flags, and photographs, the 2025 Constitution expressly includes persona, voice, writings, heritage, and intellectual property protections for both the Imam and the Ismaili Imamat.
From a doctrinal perspective within the Ismaili tradition, Farmans occupy a distinct and unique position. Mawlana Hazar Imam has stated:
“The fundamental principles and values of our faith have not changed. We learn them from the Qur’an, from the example of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and from the Farmans of the Imams.”
— Imam Shah Rahim al-Husayni (a.s.), 27 August 2025
In this context, Farmans are understood by murids as spiritual guidance conveyed through the authority of the Imam, rooted in Qur’anic principles and the continuity of the Imamate. This theological framing is distinct from, but may intersect with, questions of institutional administration and intellectual property as understood in modern legal frameworks.
For this reason, some murids may distinguish between intellectual property protections applied to institutional, administrative, educational, commercial, or representational materials, and the dissemination of Farmans as religious guidance intended for the spiritual and material benefit of the Jamat.
Whatever interpretive approach is taken, Article 23.4 clearly demonstrates that the Constitution recognises both Mawlana Hazar Imam and the Ismaili Imamat as distinct entities whose dignity, heritage, writings, and intellectual property are to be respected and protected.
Study Reflections
When reading the 2025 Constitution, it is helpful to ask:
* Is a provision referring to the Imam personally?
* Is it referring to the institution of the Ismaili Imamat?
* Is it referring to a constitutional body such as the Diwan of the Ismaili Imamat or a Delegation of the Ismaili Imamat?
The Constitution frequently distinguishes between these concepts. Understanding those distinctions provides a clearer picture of how the Imam’s guidance, Farmans, constitutional governance, diplomacy, and institutional administration operate together within the contemporary Ismaili tradition for the spiritual and material benefit of the Jamat.
A request has been submitted to the Leaders for any comments or clarification. If received they will be shared in this forum too.
References and Caveats
Primary Sources
1. Constitution 2025 – Global Constitution.
2. Farmans of Mawlana Hazar Imam.
3. Ismaili Imamat official publications and website.
Caveats and Limitations
1. The amended National Constitutions, Rules and Regulations referred to in the 2025 Constitution have not all been made publicly available. Requests for access remain outstanding.
2. Not all Farmans have been made available to murids in every jurisdiction. Readers should therefore be aware that this study is based upon the materials currently available.
3. This study is intended as an educational analysis of constitutional texts and publicly available sources. Readers should consult original constitutional documents, Farmans, and official publications wherever possible.
Relevant Source Quotations
The following extracts are reproduced for reference and study purposes:
Constitution 2025 – Definition of the Seat of the Ismaili Imamat
“The existing Seat of the Ismaili Imamat as provided in Article 4, and more particularly described in the First Schedule.”
Constitution 2025 – Definition of the Ismaili Imamat
“The institution or office of the Imam of the Shia Imami Ismaili Muslim.”
Constitution 2025 – Article 4: Seat of the Ismaili Imamat
Article Four SEAT OF THE ISMAILI IMAMAT
4.1 In accordance with inherent Imamat authority, historical right and ancestral
adition, Mawlana Hazar Imam may designate one or more Seats of the Ismai
namat, for such purpose and for such duration as Mawlana Hazar Imam ma
determine.
4.2 The existing Seat, known as the Diwan of the Ismaili Imamat as more particularly
described in the First Schedule, acts as a locus for the Imamat for:
(a) its engagement with the Jamat;
(b) its wider institutional interactions, diplomatic relations and discourse;
(c) its endeavours t o foster human flourishing; and
(d) such other purposes as Mawlana Hazar Imam may determine.
Constitution 2025 – Article 6: Diplomatic Practice
Article Six DIPLOMATIC PRACTICE
In accordance with inherent Imamat authority, historical right and ancestral
tradition, Mawlana Hazar Imam may:
6.1 enter into treaties, conventions, charters, agreements, accords, protocols
and memoranda of understanding with states, governments, international
organisations and such other authorities as Mawlana Hazar Imam may
determine;
6.2 appoint Personal Representatives, Senior Officials, ambassadors, envoys,
delegations, or other representatives t o states, governments, international
organisations and such other authorities as Mawlana Hazar Imam may
determine, with such accreditation and guidelines a s may be conferred from
time t o time b y Mawlana Hazar Imam and who shall hold office for such period
a s Mawlana Hazar Imam may determine; and
6.3 designate as a "Delegation of the Ismaili Imamat" institutions established
to serve a representational role for the Imamat, for building relationships,
enabling diplomacy and public engagement, reflecting the spiritual dimensions
of Islam and the endeavours of the Imamat for human progress, the existing
such Delegations being more particularly described in the Fourth Schedule.
Constitution 2025 – Article 23.4
23.4 Display o f Mawlana Hazar Imam's image, photograph o r persona, or rendition
o f his voice, writings or heritage, in each case through any medium including
digital, electronic, print, or recorded media or in any format, in domestic or commercial premises, shall b e in keeping with the dignity of Mawlana Hazar Imam and shall not be such as to allow the display or rendition to lend itself
to commercial, advertising, publicity, propaganda or similar purposes or in any way to infringe the intellectual property of Mawlana Hazar Imam or the
Ismaili Imamat. The requirements of this Article shall extend to and include
any period prior to Mawlana Hazar Imam's accession to the Ismaili Imamat and in equal measure to any of his predecessors both before and after their accession to the Ismaili Imamat.
Prince Karim Aga Khan IV – Parliament of Canada, 2014
“Ismaili Imamat is a supra-national entity, representing the succession of Imams since the time of the Prophet Muhammad.
The role of the Ismaili Imam is a spiritual one; his authority is that of religious interpretation.”
Lisbon Interview, July 2018
“AC: I would also like to ask you what the Portuguese can expect, by having the Seat of the Ismaili Imamat in Lisbon?
When problems arise, and they are not here, but they arise in other countries, it is when religious institutions and national goals are not compatible. That is when we have trouble. However, Portugal has been very smart to work with religious institutions. We are not the only religion with which the Government works.
AK: Well … the context is between the relationship between religious institutions and modern governance. This is the real context. A context in which religious institutions are improved in what they do, that is, they need a safe environment to enable them to function. These institutions, such as humanitarian institutions, have taken on certain objectives and developed their civil society capacity. And it is very important that country laws allow religious institutions to thrive, as it is even in the national interest. And Portugal is the ideal country for this relationship and has been extremely considerate to me, as Imam.
I think the country has been very intelligent, in what concerns the building of bridges so that religions work well and always with a result that is of national interest. When problems arise, and they are not here, but they arise in other countries, it is when religious institutions and national goals are not compatible. That is when we have trouble. However, Portugal has been very smart to work with religious institutions. We are not the only religion with which the Government works. There is a very, very strong national precedent for this relationship to work. As a religion, we are working in the domain that is already very well positioned for the two sides to work together and as it should be. We are very grateful and honoured for that.”
Aga Khan Interview July 2018
viewtopic.php?p=63707&sid=ef2ab0169080f ... 3cf#p63707
Diwan of the Ismaili Imamat Ordination – 11 July 2018
Hazar Imam ordained in a Firman, the "Diwan of the Ismaili Imamat", and signed the constitutional legal instrument on 11 July 2018
Link to the video
http://ismaili.net/timeline/2018/2018-0 ... -didar.mov
Link
http://www.ismaili.net/html/modules.php ... 3583#63583
-
mahebubchatur
- Posts: 831
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 7:01 pm
Ismaili Constitution 2025 - IIS ITREB First signed by Shah Rahim Aga Khan V
Ismaili Constitution 2025 Study Series
ITREB, The Institute of Ismaili Studies (IIS), and the Constitutional Position of Farmans:
And, a Comparison of the 2025 and 1998 Constitutions
Introduction
A comparison of Article 10 of the 2025 Constitution and Article 8 of the 1998 Constitution reveals a significant degree of continuity in the constitutional role of the Tariqah and Religious Education Boards (ITREBs).
The fundamental mandate remains broadly unchanged: to provide religious education, train those responsible for religious teaching and waz, support research and publication, provide guidance on religious rites and practices, and perform such functions relating to the Ismaili Tariqah as Mawlana Hazar Imam may deem necessary.
Key Changes in the 2025 Constitution
1. Gender-Inclusive Language
The 2025 Constitution updates language throughout the Article:
* Chairman → Chair
* Chairmen → Chairs
* Mukhis → Mukhis and Mukhianis
* Kamadias → Kamadias and Kamadianis
* Religion teachers and waezeen → educators and those who deliver waz
This is the most visible constitutional change.
2. Broader Educational Terminology
The 1998 Constitution referred to the training of “religion teachers and waezeen.”
The 2025 Constitution refers to “educators and those who deliver waz.”
This appears to broaden the constitutional scope to encompass a wider range of educational and instructional roles.
3. More Structured Jurisdiction
The 2025 Constitution specifically links extended jurisdiction to “Jurisdiction Territories” identified elsewhere in the Constitution, providing a clearer constitutional framework for regional and cross-border responsibilities.
What Has Not Changed?
The constitutional duties of ITREB remain substantially consistent:
* Religious education at all levels
* Training and upgrading of educators and those who deliver waz
* Research relating to Islam and the Ismaili Tariqah
* Publication of books and educational materials
* Guidance on religious rites and practices
* Promoting uniformity in religious practices when directed by Mawlana Hazar Imam
* Collaboration with other ITREBs worldwide
* Collaboration with The Institute of Ismaili Studies
* Preservation of voluntary service and leadership development
The three-year term of office and overall governance structure also remain essentially unchanged.
Farmans: What Does the Constitution Say?
The Constitution defines a Farman as:
“Any pronouncement, direction, order or ruling made or given by Mawlana Hazar Imam.”
The Constitution also states that:
“Ismaili Muslims worldwide be given this Constitution in order better to secure their peace and unity, religious and social welfare, to foster fruitful collaboration between different peoples, to optimise the use of resources, and to enable the Ismaili Muslims to make a valid and meaningful contribution to the improvement of the quality of life of the Ummah and the societies in which they live.”
And further:
2.6 This Constitution shall be read with any Farman made after the date hereof, and in the event of conflict the said Farman shall prevail over this Constitution, and a later Farman shall prevail over an earlier.
A significant observation is that Article 10 of the 2025 Constitution does not expressly refer to:
* Custody of Farmans
* Preservation of Farmans
* Publication of Farmans
* Dissemination of Farmans
* Translation of Farmans
* Access to Farmans by murids
* Distribution of Farmans to the Jamat
However, both the 1998 and 2025 Constitutions state that ITREB is responsible for:
* Religious education at all levels
* Research and publication
* Implementing educational programmes and curricula
* Supporting research in Islam and the Ismaili Tariqah
* Serving as a point of reference on religious matters
Farmans constitute a central source of religious guidance within the Ismaili Tariqah. Given ITREB’s constitutional responsibilities for religious education, research, publication, and guidance on religious matters, and its required collaboration with IIS, it may reasonably be argued that both institutions have important roles in the study, teaching, preservation, and communication of Farmans. However, the precise scope of those responsibilities is not expressly defined in the constitutional provisions examined here.
This does not necessarily mean such responsibilities do not exist elsewhere. They may be addressed through Rules and Regulations, institutional policies, directives, or other governance instruments. However, as of this writing, any such provisions are not generally available for review by all murids, making it difficult to determine whether these matters are explicitly addressed within the broader governance framework.
The Institute of Ismaili Studies (IIS)
Both the 1998 and 2025 Constitutions require ITREB to:
“work in close collaboration with The Institute of Ismaili Studies.”
The Constitution states that this collaboration is intended to:
* Facilitate empathy and convergence
* Support harmonious relationships between programmes
* Develop human resources
* Develop educational materials
* Encourage constructive interaction between the religious and secular dimensions of education
The constitutional relationship is therefore described as one of collaboration and mutual support in educational and scholarly matters.
The Constitution does not expressly state that IIS:
* Governs ITREB
* Appoints ITREB members
* Supervises ITREB
* Controls ITREB
* Possesses constitutional authority over ITREB
The constitutional language is collaborative rather than supervisory.
What Does the Constitution Say About IIS?
The Seventeenth Schedule of the 2025 Constitution describes The Institute of Ismaili Studies as follows:
“The Institute of Ismaili Studies, founded by the Ismaili Imamat, aims to promote scholarship and learning on Islam, with emphasis on Shia Islam in general and its Ismaili Tariqah in particular and a better understanding of their relationship with other faiths and societies. Its programmes, informed by the full range of diversity within Islam, explore the relationship of religious ideas to broader dimensions of society and culture, paying particular attention to issues of ethics in modern life. It also encourages an interdisciplinary approach to materials of Islamic history and thought. In pursuit of its objectives, the Institute collaborates with other institutions of learning.”
Notably, this description contains no express reference to:
* Custody of Farmans
* Publication of Farmans
* Dissemination of Farmans
* Control of religious education boards
* Authority over ITREB
* Approval of waez content
* Appointment of educators
* Management of Jamati religious institutions
Instead, IIS is described primarily as a scholarly and educational institution focused on research, learning, ethics, history, thought, and academic collaboration.
Constitutional Text and Contemporary Practice
Many Jamati members have observed that, in practice, IIS has played a substantial role in:
* Ismaili religious curriculum development
* Production of educational materials
* Educator and leader training
* Waez training programmes
* Religious education programmes
* Publication of a significant body of Ismaili literature
It is also widely understood that Farman compilations and related educational materials have, in practice, been produced and printed through institutional arrangements involving IIS.
However, neither Article 10 nor the Seventeenth Schedule expressly assigns constitutional responsibility for the custody, preservation, publication, dissemination, translation, or accessibility of Farmans to IIS.
This gives rise to a constitutional question:
If Farmans are central to the religious life and guidance of the Jamat, where within the constitutional framework are responsibility, authority, accountability, and oversight for their preservation, publication, dissemination, translation, and accessibility expressly stated and located?
Based on the provisions examined here, the 2025 Constitution does not directly answer that question.
Conclusion
The comparison suggests that the constitutional role of ITREB has remained largely consistent between 1998 and 2025.
The principal changes are:
1. Gender-inclusive language
2. Recognition of Mukhianis and Kamadianis
3. Broader educational terminology
4. More structured jurisdictional provisions
5. Modernised drafting style
At the same time, neither Article 10 nor the Seventeenth Schedule expressly assigns responsibility for the custody, preservation, publication, dissemination, translation, or accessibility of Farmans.
Whether these responsibilities are addressed elsewhere through Rules and Regulations, institutional directives, or other governance instruments remains unclear from the constitutional provisions examined here.
For many Jamati members, this may be an important area for further constitutional study, clarification, and discussion.
REFERENCE TEXT
2025 CONSTITUTION – ARTICLE 10.1
“There shall be a Tariqah and Religious Education Board for each of the territories specified in the Eighth Schedule to be known as ‘The Shia Imami Ismaili Tariqah and Religious Education Board’ for the territory for which it is formed for the provision of religious education at all levels of the Jamat, for the training of educators and those who deliver waz, for research and publication, and for the performance of such functions in relation to the Ismaili Tariqah as Mawlana Hazar Imam may deem necessary.”
⸻
1998 CONSTITUTION – ARTICLE 8.1
“There shall be a Tariqah and Religious Education Board for each of the territories specified in Part I of the Fourth Schedule to be known as ‘The Shia Imami Ismaili Tariqah and Religious Education Board’ for the territory for which it is formed for the provision of religious education at all levels of the Jamat, for the training of religion teachers and waezeen, for research and publication, and for the performance of such functions in relation to the Ismaili Tariqah as Mawlana Hazar Imam may deem necessary.”
⸻
2025 CONSTITUTION – SEVENTEENTH SCHEDULE (excerpt)
“The Institute of Ismaili Studies, founded by the Ismaili Imamat, aims to promote scholarship and learning on Islam, with emphasis on Shia Islam in general and its Ismaili Tariqah in particular and a better understanding of their relationship with other faiths and societies. Its programmes, informed by the full range of diversity within Islam, explore the relationship of religious ideas to broader dimensions of society and culture, paying particular attention to issues of ethics in modern life. It also encourages an interdisciplinary approach to materials of Islamic history and thought. In pursuit of its objectives, the Institute collaborates with other institutions of learning.”
ITREB, The Institute of Ismaili Studies (IIS), and the Constitutional Position of Farmans:
And, a Comparison of the 2025 and 1998 Constitutions
Introduction
A comparison of Article 10 of the 2025 Constitution and Article 8 of the 1998 Constitution reveals a significant degree of continuity in the constitutional role of the Tariqah and Religious Education Boards (ITREBs).
The fundamental mandate remains broadly unchanged: to provide religious education, train those responsible for religious teaching and waz, support research and publication, provide guidance on religious rites and practices, and perform such functions relating to the Ismaili Tariqah as Mawlana Hazar Imam may deem necessary.
Key Changes in the 2025 Constitution
1. Gender-Inclusive Language
The 2025 Constitution updates language throughout the Article:
* Chairman → Chair
* Chairmen → Chairs
* Mukhis → Mukhis and Mukhianis
* Kamadias → Kamadias and Kamadianis
* Religion teachers and waezeen → educators and those who deliver waz
This is the most visible constitutional change.
2. Broader Educational Terminology
The 1998 Constitution referred to the training of “religion teachers and waezeen.”
The 2025 Constitution refers to “educators and those who deliver waz.”
This appears to broaden the constitutional scope to encompass a wider range of educational and instructional roles.
3. More Structured Jurisdiction
The 2025 Constitution specifically links extended jurisdiction to “Jurisdiction Territories” identified elsewhere in the Constitution, providing a clearer constitutional framework for regional and cross-border responsibilities.
What Has Not Changed?
The constitutional duties of ITREB remain substantially consistent:
* Religious education at all levels
* Training and upgrading of educators and those who deliver waz
* Research relating to Islam and the Ismaili Tariqah
* Publication of books and educational materials
* Guidance on religious rites and practices
* Promoting uniformity in religious practices when directed by Mawlana Hazar Imam
* Collaboration with other ITREBs worldwide
* Collaboration with The Institute of Ismaili Studies
* Preservation of voluntary service and leadership development
The three-year term of office and overall governance structure also remain essentially unchanged.
Farmans: What Does the Constitution Say?
The Constitution defines a Farman as:
“Any pronouncement, direction, order or ruling made or given by Mawlana Hazar Imam.”
The Constitution also states that:
“Ismaili Muslims worldwide be given this Constitution in order better to secure their peace and unity, religious and social welfare, to foster fruitful collaboration between different peoples, to optimise the use of resources, and to enable the Ismaili Muslims to make a valid and meaningful contribution to the improvement of the quality of life of the Ummah and the societies in which they live.”
And further:
2.6 This Constitution shall be read with any Farman made after the date hereof, and in the event of conflict the said Farman shall prevail over this Constitution, and a later Farman shall prevail over an earlier.
A significant observation is that Article 10 of the 2025 Constitution does not expressly refer to:
* Custody of Farmans
* Preservation of Farmans
* Publication of Farmans
* Dissemination of Farmans
* Translation of Farmans
* Access to Farmans by murids
* Distribution of Farmans to the Jamat
However, both the 1998 and 2025 Constitutions state that ITREB is responsible for:
* Religious education at all levels
* Research and publication
* Implementing educational programmes and curricula
* Supporting research in Islam and the Ismaili Tariqah
* Serving as a point of reference on religious matters
Farmans constitute a central source of religious guidance within the Ismaili Tariqah. Given ITREB’s constitutional responsibilities for religious education, research, publication, and guidance on religious matters, and its required collaboration with IIS, it may reasonably be argued that both institutions have important roles in the study, teaching, preservation, and communication of Farmans. However, the precise scope of those responsibilities is not expressly defined in the constitutional provisions examined here.
This does not necessarily mean such responsibilities do not exist elsewhere. They may be addressed through Rules and Regulations, institutional policies, directives, or other governance instruments. However, as of this writing, any such provisions are not generally available for review by all murids, making it difficult to determine whether these matters are explicitly addressed within the broader governance framework.
The Institute of Ismaili Studies (IIS)
Both the 1998 and 2025 Constitutions require ITREB to:
“work in close collaboration with The Institute of Ismaili Studies.”
The Constitution states that this collaboration is intended to:
* Facilitate empathy and convergence
* Support harmonious relationships between programmes
* Develop human resources
* Develop educational materials
* Encourage constructive interaction between the religious and secular dimensions of education
The constitutional relationship is therefore described as one of collaboration and mutual support in educational and scholarly matters.
The Constitution does not expressly state that IIS:
* Governs ITREB
* Appoints ITREB members
* Supervises ITREB
* Controls ITREB
* Possesses constitutional authority over ITREB
The constitutional language is collaborative rather than supervisory.
What Does the Constitution Say About IIS?
The Seventeenth Schedule of the 2025 Constitution describes The Institute of Ismaili Studies as follows:
“The Institute of Ismaili Studies, founded by the Ismaili Imamat, aims to promote scholarship and learning on Islam, with emphasis on Shia Islam in general and its Ismaili Tariqah in particular and a better understanding of their relationship with other faiths and societies. Its programmes, informed by the full range of diversity within Islam, explore the relationship of religious ideas to broader dimensions of society and culture, paying particular attention to issues of ethics in modern life. It also encourages an interdisciplinary approach to materials of Islamic history and thought. In pursuit of its objectives, the Institute collaborates with other institutions of learning.”
Notably, this description contains no express reference to:
* Custody of Farmans
* Publication of Farmans
* Dissemination of Farmans
* Control of religious education boards
* Authority over ITREB
* Approval of waez content
* Appointment of educators
* Management of Jamati religious institutions
Instead, IIS is described primarily as a scholarly and educational institution focused on research, learning, ethics, history, thought, and academic collaboration.
Constitutional Text and Contemporary Practice
Many Jamati members have observed that, in practice, IIS has played a substantial role in:
* Ismaili religious curriculum development
* Production of educational materials
* Educator and leader training
* Waez training programmes
* Religious education programmes
* Publication of a significant body of Ismaili literature
It is also widely understood that Farman compilations and related educational materials have, in practice, been produced and printed through institutional arrangements involving IIS.
However, neither Article 10 nor the Seventeenth Schedule expressly assigns constitutional responsibility for the custody, preservation, publication, dissemination, translation, or accessibility of Farmans to IIS.
This gives rise to a constitutional question:
If Farmans are central to the religious life and guidance of the Jamat, where within the constitutional framework are responsibility, authority, accountability, and oversight for their preservation, publication, dissemination, translation, and accessibility expressly stated and located?
Based on the provisions examined here, the 2025 Constitution does not directly answer that question.
Conclusion
The comparison suggests that the constitutional role of ITREB has remained largely consistent between 1998 and 2025.
The principal changes are:
1. Gender-inclusive language
2. Recognition of Mukhianis and Kamadianis
3. Broader educational terminology
4. More structured jurisdictional provisions
5. Modernised drafting style
At the same time, neither Article 10 nor the Seventeenth Schedule expressly assigns responsibility for the custody, preservation, publication, dissemination, translation, or accessibility of Farmans.
Whether these responsibilities are addressed elsewhere through Rules and Regulations, institutional directives, or other governance instruments remains unclear from the constitutional provisions examined here.
For many Jamati members, this may be an important area for further constitutional study, clarification, and discussion.
REFERENCE TEXT
2025 CONSTITUTION – ARTICLE 10.1
“There shall be a Tariqah and Religious Education Board for each of the territories specified in the Eighth Schedule to be known as ‘The Shia Imami Ismaili Tariqah and Religious Education Board’ for the territory for which it is formed for the provision of religious education at all levels of the Jamat, for the training of educators and those who deliver waz, for research and publication, and for the performance of such functions in relation to the Ismaili Tariqah as Mawlana Hazar Imam may deem necessary.”
⸻
1998 CONSTITUTION – ARTICLE 8.1
“There shall be a Tariqah and Religious Education Board for each of the territories specified in Part I of the Fourth Schedule to be known as ‘The Shia Imami Ismaili Tariqah and Religious Education Board’ for the territory for which it is formed for the provision of religious education at all levels of the Jamat, for the training of religion teachers and waezeen, for research and publication, and for the performance of such functions in relation to the Ismaili Tariqah as Mawlana Hazar Imam may deem necessary.”
⸻
2025 CONSTITUTION – SEVENTEENTH SCHEDULE (excerpt)
“The Institute of Ismaili Studies, founded by the Ismaili Imamat, aims to promote scholarship and learning on Islam, with emphasis on Shia Islam in general and its Ismaili Tariqah in particular and a better understanding of their relationship with other faiths and societies. Its programmes, informed by the full range of diversity within Islam, explore the relationship of religious ideas to broader dimensions of society and culture, paying particular attention to issues of ethics in modern life. It also encourages an interdisciplinary approach to materials of Islamic history and thought. In pursuit of its objectives, the Institute collaborates with other institutions of learning.”
-
mahebubchatur
- Posts: 831
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 7:01 pm
Ismaili Constitution 2025 - First signed by Shah Rahim Aga Khan V
The Ismaili constitution - a Farman - for those interested to read study understand as Hazar Imam has directed in Farmans
Link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oW61Qk ... p=drivesdk
Link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oW61Qk ... p=drivesdk