Hazar Imam did not say that the gift should be returned to each one of you but he said it should be returned in each of your lives
If this is not about multiplicity of one's life what was that? Those with audio tapes, please check

You quoted Ginan part of Pir Sat Gurnur above, and I quoted following Ginan part of Pir Sadardin from Saloko Nano:kmaherali wrote:Welcome back Mazarshah or whoever you are.
ejee nur sat-gur bolea veenatee,
saa(n)bhalo gat jamaath jee;
daso(n)d dejo apannaa gur-mukhe,
to utaraso paele paar;
saachee sukareet laeene chaalajo,
nahee(n) to paddaso lakh choraasee maa(n)e jee...............5
Nur Satgur has uttered this entreaty, so listen, o community and congregation! If you pay the tithe to your Guide, you will be delivered across to the other side. Go forth with true good deeds, for otherwise you will fall into the eighty-four lakhs cycles.
I don't see any conflict. The Sloko verse that you pointed out refers to the conditions of this life i.e, deserted village, the rich and the poor. Hence no life after death can only mean a person cannot get back to this life after death. It does not apply to the hereafter.shivatrivedi wrote:There is obvious contradiction in both parts, which is correct philosophy?
As usual you twisted the meaning and explanation.kmaherali wrote:I don't see any conflict. The Sloko verse that you pointed out refers to the conditions of this life i.e, deserted village, the rich and the poor. Hence no life after death can only mean a person cannot get back to this life after death. It does not apply to the hereafter.shivatrivedi wrote:There is obvious contradiction in both parts, which is correct philosophy?
If you say that there is no rebirth after death, you are also denying rebirth in higher spheres that MSMS has referred to.
MSMS used the word "rebirth". Check the message yourself. The soul remains the same but it assumes different forms. There is a Ginan verse stating:shivatrivedi wrote:MSMS has said elevation of soul in higher spheres, a soul can not take rebirth. Soul created will stay as it is.
Your reference of single Ginan line is not a proof of reincarnation or rebirth. You have habit of taking a sentence from here and there out of context to prove your point. You have not given complete part of Ginan, name of Pir/Syed, in what context or back ground the line stands for. The word used is DUHAGAN, its opposite comes SUHAGAN. It is common in subcontinent poetry, the sufi poets have introduced themselves as a woman or a wife to please lover or murshid to be near to him. Janamo janamo.... in Urdu poetry is used janam janam ki piyasi, this does not mean rebirths. It is a kind of metaphor.kmaherali wrote:MSMS used the word "rebirth". Check the message yourself. The soul remains the same but it assumes different forms. There is a Ginan verse stating:shivatrivedi wrote:MSMS has said elevation of soul in higher spheres, a soul can not take rebirth. Soul created will stay as it is.
Jirevala Janamo janamo ni dohagann hoti
Meaning:
Births after births I have been unmarried..
I think it would be best to agree to disagree on this matter. There is diversity in our tariqah so let that be the case. It seems we are just repeating the arguments over and over.shivatrivedi wrote:For rebirth and reincarnation, please read again the explanation given to count Paro, African study circle in this thread.