which one is true evolution or adam and eve???

Whatever happened before Adam
Post Reply
zeeba
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 3:33 pm

which one is true evolution or adam and eve???

Post by zeeba »

i don't get which therory is most plausible, adam and eve or the story of evolution? :?:
Admin
Posts: 6687
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 10:37 am
Contact:

Post by Admin »

Maybe both are right ;-)

Have a look on the results of the following past Poll to see who thinks what on evolution:


Is Darwinism a theory or a fact?

It is a theory 58.64 % (207)
It is a fact 23.23 % (82)
I don''t know 18.13 % (64)


Total votes: 353
ShamsB
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 5:20 pm

Post by ShamsB »

Admin wrote:Maybe both are right ;-)

Have a look on the results of the following past Poll to see who thinks what on evolution:


Is Darwinism a theory or a fact?

It is a theory 58.64 % (207)
It is a fact 23.23 % (82)
I don''t know 18.13 % (64)


Total votes: 353
Please read Das Avatar.

Shams
kmaherali
Posts: 25105
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 3:01 pm

Post by kmaherali »

There has also been discussion on this issue in this forum under:

Doctrines -> Darwin's theory & Das Avtaar

Current Issues -> Darwinism vs Intelligent Design
avmeghani
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 2:29 pm

Post by avmeghani »

THE theory of evolution maintains that life on Earth came about as the result of chance and emerged by itself from natural conditions. This theory is not a scientific law or a proven fact. Underneath its scientific façade it is a materialist worldview that Darwinists are trying to impose on society. The bases of this theory, which has been disproved by science in every field, are suggestions and propaganda methods consisting of deceptions, falsehood, contradiction, cheating, and sleight of hand. The theory of evolution was put forward as an imaginary hypothesis in the context of the primitive scientific understanding of the nineteenth century, and to this day it has not been backed up by any scientific discovery or experiment. on the contrary, all the methods employed to confirm the theory have merely proven its invalidity. However, even today many people think that the theory is a proven fact, like the force of gravity or the law of buoyancy. Because, as stated at the beginning, the true nature of the theory of evolution is very different from what is usually supposed. For this reason, some people do not know what rotten foundations this theory has, how it is disproved by science at every turn, and how evolutionists are trying to keep it alive in its death throes. Evolutionists have no other support than unconfirmed hypotheses, biased and unrealistic observations, and imaginary drawings, methods of psychological suggestion, countless falsehoods, and sleight-of-hand techniques.Nothing was known in Darwins time about the complex structure of the cell.Today, such branches of science as paleontology, genetics, biochemistry, and molecular biology have proven that it is quite impossible for life to come about as a result of chance and to emerge by itself from natural conditions. The living cell, it is commonly agreed by the world of science, is the most complex structure that mankind has so far encountered. Modern science has revealed that just one living cell has a much more complex structure and mutually interconnected complicated systems than a large city. Such a complex structure can only function if all its separate parts emerge at the same time and in full working order. Otherwise, it will serve no purpose, and will fall apart over time and disappear. We cannot expect that its parts developed by chance over millions of years as claimed by the theory of evolution. For that reason, the complex design in just one cell clearly shows that God created life.
Post Reply