kmaherali wrote:The concept of Imam as Natiq and Pir as Samit are zaheri concepts. They do not have much significance in our Tariqa. I have never heard a Farman when the Imam says his the Natiq.mazharshah wrote:Your above statement is more complex than the complex farman of Imam. I could not understood what you want to explain.
Sir, when Imam is Natiq, Pir is Samit. Interpreter of faith is Imam. In JK, I heard only missionary saheb or chairman of ITREB explaining farman.
You wrote," Farmans and Ginans are same". Do you consider Sayyedah Imam
Begum's ginans are farman? Please explain.
Remember our faith did not start 1400 years ago. It has existed since creation. Hence from the batin Imam is always above every other concepts.Imamat and Piratan existed before the Natiq and Asas were invented.
To Km,
If Natiq and Samit are Zaheri concepts then why still are we running after these terms and wasting our time, Prophet was Natiq and Imam was Samit!!!
I wander our Ismaili Tariqa EXISTED SINCE CREATION. Why is this not clearly mentioned in Ismaili histories and in text books of REC's? Still we keep running after Ta'weel, Taqiyya, and Batin. Today's REC students want clear and understandable facts and figures.